WikiFX Valentine's Message | Trade Safely, Together Every Step of the Way
In the Forex Market, Trust Is Not a Promise — It’s Verified Through Safety, Transparency, and Support
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has filed a civil enforcement action against Las Vegas-based 5 Fruits Enterprises LLC, its founder, Calvin Guess, and co-manager Marcus Ligon, accusing them of running an investment fraud scheme that used automated trading “bots” to defraud investors.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has filed a civil enforcement action against Las Vegas-based 5 Fruits Enterprises LLC, its founder, Calvin Guess, and co-manager Marcus Ligon, accusing them of running an investment fraud scheme that used automated trading “bots” to defraud investors. The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada on September 4, 2025, alleges the defendants falsely represented that investor funds were being traded by profitable automated systems when those bots either did not exist or were not used as advertised.
According to the SEC, 5 Fruits marketed options-trading services and promised investors high, consistent returns driven by proprietary automation. The agency says promotional materials and direct communications overstated performance and misrepresented how client funds were handled — conduct that, the SEC asserts, violated the federal securities laws. Bloomberg Law reported regulators' view that the advertised trading bots “didnt really exist,” a central allegation in the SECs case.
The court's final judgment against 5 Fruits Enterprises details monetary remedies. The judgment orders disgorgement of $1,156,166.13 (net profits) plus prejudgment interest of $253,048.11, and imposes a civil penalty on the defendants, reflecting the SECs demand that ill-gotten gains be returned and future misconduct be deterred. The judgment is publicly available in the SECs litigation files.
What this means for investors: the SECs action underscores the risk of trusting online promises of automated trading returns without verifiable evidence. Investors tempted by “bot” trading services should demand audited performance records, clear custody arrangements, and independent verification of trading activity before committing funds. Regulators have increasingly targeted schemes that use flashy technology claims to mask misappropriation or false performance reporting.
The SEC's litigation release and accompanying court documents provide the full complaint, judgment, and related materials for public review. As enforcement activity continues, the case against 5 Fruits Enterprises highlights both the persistent creativity of fraudsters and the SECs focus on protecting retail investors from deceptive trading schemes. For investors and advisers, the key takeaways are diligence, skepticism of unverifiable automation claims, and the importance of using regulated custodians and transparent platforms.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

In the Forex Market, Trust Is Not a Promise — It’s Verified Through Safety, Transparency, and Support

Did you face losses due to a sudden change in the trading price on the datian platform? Were your transaction records deleted by the Hong Kong-based forex broker? Did the broker liquidate your trading account multiple times despite not reaching the stage where it mandated this move? Have you experienced heavy slippage on the trading platform? Concerned by these issues, traders have complained about the broker online. We will let you know of these with attached screenshots in this datian review article. Keep reading!

Did you face constant rejections of your fund withdrawal applications by TopstepFX? Have you been denied withdrawals in the name of hedging? Did you witness an account block without any clear explanation from the forex broker? There have been numerous user claims against TopstepFX regarding its withdrawals, payout delays and other issues. In the TopstepFX review article, we have investigated the top complaints against the US-based forex broker. Keep reading!

When choosing a broker, the first question is always about safety and legitimacy. Is my capital safe? For Mazi Finance, the answer is clear and worrying: Mazi Finance is an unregulated broker. While the company, MaziMatic Financial Services LTD, is registered in the offshore location of Saint Lucia, this business registration does not replace strong financial regulation from a top-level authority. Independent analysis from regulatory watchdogs shows a very low trust score, made worse by official warnings from government financial bodies and many user complaints about serious problems. This article provides a clear, fact-based analysis of the Mazi Finance regulation status. Our goal is to break down the facts and present the risks clearly, helping you make an informed decision and protect your capital.