简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Santander Denies Breach of U.S. Sanctions in Iran-Linked Accounts Case
Abstract:Santander Asserts Compliance Amid Financial Times' Claims on Iran-Linked Accounts: Get the latest updates on the bank's stance and commitment to international financial regulations.

Spain's banking giant Santander (SAN.MC) has maintained that it has found no indication of a breach of US sanctions against Iran. This announcement came on Tuesday, after a thorough investigation prompted by a Financial Times exposé on Iranian-linked accounts.
Last week, the Financial Times (FT) startled the financial world by reporting that Iran has accounts with Santander and Lloyds (LLOY.L) in the United Kingdom. According to the FT, these accounts were part of a covert operation to move funds across the globe while evading penalties. The Iranian intelligence services were behind this scheme.
Santander's internal correspondence, first reported by Bloomberg News and then obtained by Reuters, reveals a different narrative. The global head of communications at Santander said that the bank uncovered no instances of sanction breaches in its global operations after completing a comprehensive assessment of the businesses and individuals mentioned in the FT piece.
Previously, the FT stated that Lloyds and Santander UK were giving accounts to British front companies. A London-based Iranian petrochemical company that had received sanctions was privately in charge of these businesses. Despite these allegations, Santander and Lloyds declared last week that bank inspections found no breaches of penalties.
The issue centers on Iran's state-owned Petrochemical Commercial Company (PCC) and its British branch, PCC UK. According to the Financial Times, the United States has sanctioned both since November 2018. The United States accuses them of raising significant cash for the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Quds Force and coordinating with Russian intelligence.

One of the alleged front firms, Pisco UK, established at a detached property in Surrey, is said to have utilized a Santander UK business account.
However, Santander clarified in a statement issued on Tuesday that this account was closed in 2022 for reasons unconnected to these concerns.
According to Santander, “Neither the account holder nor the identified owners of the business were targeted for sanctions during the life of the account, and none are today.” The bank also said that the number of transactions done via this account while it was active was minimal.
This development comes at a time when global financial institutions are under severe scrutiny for their adherence to international sanctions.
The claims and ensuing investigations emphasize the difficulties banks confront as they navigate the complicated network of global financing and sanctions.
Santander's straightforward announcement and the closure of the involved account may give some confidence to stakeholders worried about international regulatory compliance. However, the case demonstrates banks' persistent difficulties in detecting and combating illegal financial activity, particularly those involving sanctioned groups and governments.
The findings of such investigations are critical since the whole financial world is watching them. They have far-reaching ramifications for the global financial system's integrity and the reputations of the institutions involved. Other financial institutions, regulatory agencies, and governments throughout the world will undoubtedly be monitoring Santander's reply.
Finally, Santander's denial of any infringement of US sanctions in this instance is a watershed moment in the continuing battle to preserve a transparent and compliant international financial system. The bank's comprehensive examination and open communication demonstrate its dedication to following global financial standards.
For more detailed information about Santander and its stance on international financial compliance, visit their profile on WikiFX at Santander on WikiFX. Stay informed about the latest developments in the financial world and how they impact global banking institutions like Santander by checking out WikiFX Daily News. Keep up-to-date with the latest financial news and insights to navigate the complexities of the global financial landscape.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

BROKSTOCK Exposed: Traders Report Login Errors, Withdrawal Issues & Incompetent Customer Support
Is your BROKSTOCK trading account full of inefficiencies? Do the recurrent BROKSTOCK login errors prevent you from opening and shorting positions at a favorable price? Has the broker failed to honor your withdrawal requests? Do you face order execution price issues? Has the customer support service failed to resolve your queries? You are not alone! In this BROKSTOCK review article, we have shared some complaints that need a close introspection. Read on to explore them.

OmegaPro Review: Traders Flood Comment Sections with Withdrawal Denials & Scam Complaints
Has your deposit and withdrawal scenario worsened after the initial good experience at OmegaPro, a UK-based forex broker? Does the broker ask you to invest when withdrawing your funds? Did the broker officials trap you with their false promises of compound interest on your deposit? Have you found it impossible to transfer funds from your OmegaPro login to another broker’s account? Do you witness a lack of support when dealing with these unfortunate trading circumstances? These are no longer isolated complaints — they have allegedly become the reason for OmegaPro’s tarnished trust and reputation within the trading community. Read on as we share the OmegaPro review in this article.

Inzo Broker Review 2025: A Complete Look at Features, Costs and User Claims
Inzo Broker presents itself as a modern forex and CFD broker, started in 2021 and registered in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. At first glance, it offers an attractive package for traders: access to the popular MetaTrader 5 (MT5) and cTrader platforms, different types of accounts for various budget levels, and a wide selection of assets to trade. These features are made to attract both new and experienced traders. However, a closer look shows a big difference between these advertised benefits and the real risks. The broker works under an offshore regulatory system, which gives limited protection to investors. More importantly, Inzo has collected many serious user complaints, especially about withdrawing funds and changing trading conditions unfairly. This mix of weak oversight and serious user claims creates a high-risk situation that potential clients must carefully think about. This review will break down these parts to give a clear, fact-based view.

MSG Withdrawal Complaints and Regulatory Warning
MSG (Master Select Group) withdrawals denied. Broker is unlicensed and unregulated. NFA license claim unverified.

