简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
SEC says Binance clients in the U.S. have $2.2 billion “at significant risk."
Abstract:The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has raised concerns over the safety of $2.2 billion in customer assets held by Binance's U.S. subsidiary.

Recently, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has filed multiple charges against cryptocurrency exchange Binance, its affiliated entities, and CEO Changpeng Zhao, alleging illegal operations and the violation of securities laws. Click this link below for more details.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has raised concerns over the safety of $2.2 billion in customer assets held by Binance's U.S. subsidiary. The regulatory body has filed an emergency motion, claiming that the cryptocurrency exchange and its founder, Changpeng Zhao, maintain effective control over these funds.
Safety Concerns Surrounding Binance U.S. Customer Assets
The SEC's alarm stems from what they perceive as an insufficient level of assurance regarding the safety of the $2.2 billion in customer assets held by Binance U.S. Despite operating as a separate entity from its parent company, Binance's U.S. subsidiary has come under scrutiny due to perceived control exerted by the primary business and its founder.
SEC's Emergency Motion
To address their concerns, the SEC has taken legal action by filing an emergency motion with a federal court. The motion argues that Binance's main business, in conjunction with Changpeng Zhao, maintains effective control over the billions of dollars of customer funds held by Binance U.S. The regulatory body's aim is to obtain a temporary restraining order to freeze these assets until the situation is clarified and the safety of the funds can be ensured.
Protection of Binance U.S. Clients
The SEC's intervention is driven by the objective of protecting the assets and interests of Binance U.S. clients. By seeking a temporary restraining order, the regulatory body aims to mitigate any potential risks associated with the $2.2 billion in customer assets. This measure would enable the SEC to gain control over the situation and ensure that clients' funds are safeguarded.
Binance's Response
As of now, Binance has not issued an official statement in response to the SEC's emergency motion. However, it is worth noting that the cryptocurrency exchange has faced regulatory scrutiny in the past. Binance has made efforts to comply with regulations by establishing a separate U.S. subsidiary to cater specifically to American customers. Nonetheless, the SEC's concerns about the control exerted by Binance's main business raise questions about the efficacy of these measures.
Conclusion
The SEC's recent emergency motion highlights significant concerns surrounding the safety of $2.2 billion in customer assets held by Binance's U.S. subsidiary. While the regulatory body acknowledges the separate legal entity status of Binance U.S., it argues that the primary business and Changpeng Zhao still wield effective control over these funds. With the objective of protecting Binance U.S. clients, the SEC is seeking a temporary restraining order to freeze these assets until the situation is clarified. This move underscores the ongoing need for regulatory oversight in the cryptocurrency industry and the importance of ensuring the security of customer assets.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Simulated Trading Competition Experience Sharing
Champion Strategy Revealed: Get a Head Start on Winning

Fxcess Review: Profit Deletion, Withdrawal Denials & Illegitimate Account Blocks Irate Traders
Is withdrawing funds from Fxcess a herculean task for forex traders like you? Does it delete profits using manipulative practices? Does your Fxcess forex trading account balance turn to ZERO upon withdrawal request? Or Has your account been blocked when you sought withdrawals from it? These complaints have become extreme under Fxcess Review online. In this article, we have shared a few complaints. Take a look!

FXPIG Exposed: Traders Report Withdrawal Denials, Fund Scams & Regulatory Flags
Do you face massive losses due to astonishing spreads at FXPIG? Have you witnessed multiple trade executions by the Georgia-based forex broker even though you wanted to execute a single order? Has this piled on losses for you? Is the FXPIG withdrawal too slow? Maybe your trading issues resonate with some of your fellow traders. In this FXPIG review article, we have shared these issues so that you can introspect them thoroughly before deciding on the best forex trader.

Does WealthFX Generate Wealth or Losses for Traders? Find Out in This Review
The name WealthFX sounds appealing for all those wishing for a rewarding forex journey. However, behind the aspiring name are multiple complaints against the Comoros-based forex broker. These trading complaints dampen the broker’s reputation in the forex community. In this WealthFX review article, we have shared some of these complaints here. Take a look!

