WikiFX Valentine's Message | Trade Safely, Together Every Step of the Way
In the Forex Market, Trust Is Not a Promise — It’s Verified Through Safety, Transparency, and Support
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:In the wake of the FTX collapse, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York all brought charges against Sam Bankman-Fried.

The US Attorney, the CFTC, and the SEC all filed fraud allegations.
The former FTX CEO was charged by the US Attorney with wire fraud, commodities fraud, securities fraud, and money laundering. The CFTC is suing three defendants (SBF, FTX, and Alameda) for causing over $8 billion in FTX client deposits to be lost. The SEC is concentrating its efforts on safeguarding FTX stock investors who were duped by Sam Bankman-Fried.
According to the CFTC, SBF, FTX, and Alameda damaged customers in an $8 billion scam.
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission has filed a lawsuit against Samuel Bankman-Fried, FTX Trading Ltd. d/b/a FTX.com (FTX), and Alameda Research LLC in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Alameda).
Defendants are accused of fraud and significant misrepresentation in connection with the interstate sale of digital commodities, which resulted in the loss of nearly $8 billion in FTX client deposits.
According to the complaint, despite the fact that the centralized digital asset derivative platform FTX claimed that both client fiat and digital assets would be held in its custody and segregated from FTX's assets, customer assets were routinely accepted and held by Alameda, a sister company that provided market making.
The regulator further claimed that Alameda, Bankman-Fried, and others used consumer cash for their own operations and activities, including purchasing luxury real estate, making political donations, and investing in the high-risk, illiquid digital asset market.
Furthermore, the CFTC claims that, at the direction of Bankman-Fried, FTX employees created features in the FTX code that favored Alameda and allowed it to execute transactions even when it lacked sufficient funds, such as a “allow negative flag” and effectively limitless line of credit that allowed Alameda to withdraw billions of dollars in customer assets from FTX.
Rostin Behnam, Chairman of the CFTC. “The CFTC is fully committed to utilizing all available enforcement measures to safeguard investors and identify those who attempt to benefit via fraud and misappropriation.”
“Digital commodities asset markets continue to offer dangers for investors owing to a lack of fundamental safeguards,” stated CFTC Acting Director of Enforcement Gretchen Lowe. The defendants committed fraud by touting and marketing FTX.com as a model digital commodities asset platform, to damage US investors and the reputation of the digital asset markets. We will work relentlessly to bring such fraudsters responsible by using the full spectrum of our enforcement authorities.
According to the SEC, Samuel Bankman-Fried cheated stock investors in FTX Trading Ltd.
In a separate action, the Securities and Exchange Commission accused Samuel Bankman-Fried of organizing a plan to mislead stock investors in FTX Trading Ltd. (FTX) as the Bahamas-based business collected more than $1.8 billion, including about $1.1 billion from 90 US-based investors.
The “years-long deception” disguised from FTX investors the fact that monies from FTX clients were routed to Alameda Research LLC, his privately-held crypto hedge fund. Furthermore, Alameda received hidden preferential treatment (including a nearly limitless “line of credit” and exemption from some important FTX risk mitigation procedures). FTX was exposed to concealed risk as a result of Alameda's substantial ownership of overpriced, illiquid assets such as FTT.
According to the lawsuit, Bankman-Fried utilized FTX clients' commingled assets at Alameda to make hidden startup investments, expensive real estate acquisitions, and substantial political contributions.
“We claim that Sam Bankman-Fried erected a house of cards on a foundation of lies while promising investors that it was one of the safest structures in crypto,” stated SEC Chair Gary Gensler. Mr. Bankman-alleged Fried's fraud serves as a wake-up warning to crypto platforms that they must comply with our laws. With time-tested protections such as appropriately securing client cash and separating competing lines of business, compliance protects both those who invest on and those who invest in crypto platforms. It also sheds light on trading platform behavior for both investors and regulators via transparency and inspection power. The SEC's Enforcement Division is prepared to take action against platforms that do not comply with our securities laws.
“FTX operated behind a veneer of legitimacy Mr. Bankman-Fried created by, among other things, touting its best-in-class controls, including a proprietary 'risk engine,' and FTX's adherence to specific investor protection principles and detailed terms of service,” said Gurbir S. Grewal, Director of the SEC's Division of Enforcement. However, as we contend in our case, that veneer was not just thin, but also deceptive.
The demise of FTX shows the very serious hazards that unregistered crypto asset trading platforms may bring to both investors and clients. While we continue to investigate FTX and other entities and individuals for potential violations of federal securities laws, as alleged in our complaint, Mr. Bankman-Fried is being held accountable today for fraudulently raising billions of dollars from FTX investors and misusing funds belonging to FTX's trading customers.
On December 13, 2022, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York unsealed an indictment charging Bankman-Fried with wire fraud, commodities fraud, securities fraud, and money laundering in a concurrent, separate proceeding.
Stay tuned for more FTX News.
Download the WikiFX App from the APP STORE or GOOGLE PLAY STORE to stay updated on the latest news. Also, available for Windows PC!
Download link: https://www.wikifx.com/en/download.html

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

In the Forex Market, Trust Is Not a Promise — It’s Verified Through Safety, Transparency, and Support

Did you face losses due to a sudden change in the trading price on the datian platform? Were your transaction records deleted by the Hong Kong-based forex broker? Did the broker liquidate your trading account multiple times despite not reaching the stage where it mandated this move? Have you experienced heavy slippage on the trading platform? Concerned by these issues, traders have complained about the broker online. We will let you know of these with attached screenshots in this datian review article. Keep reading!

Did you face constant rejections of your fund withdrawal applications by TopstepFX? Have you been denied withdrawals in the name of hedging? Did you witness an account block without any clear explanation from the forex broker? There have been numerous user claims against TopstepFX regarding its withdrawals, payout delays and other issues. In the TopstepFX review article, we have investigated the top complaints against the US-based forex broker. Keep reading!

When choosing a broker, the first question is always about safety and legitimacy. Is my capital safe? For Mazi Finance, the answer is clear and worrying: Mazi Finance is an unregulated broker. While the company, MaziMatic Financial Services LTD, is registered in the offshore location of Saint Lucia, this business registration does not replace strong financial regulation from a top-level authority. Independent analysis from regulatory watchdogs shows a very low trust score, made worse by official warnings from government financial bodies and many user complaints about serious problems. This article provides a clear, fact-based analysis of the Mazi Finance regulation status. Our goal is to break down the facts and present the risks clearly, helping you make an informed decision and protect your capital.