简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
FCA Fines BGC Brokers & GFI Subsidiaries
Abstract:Due to inadequate control systems and ineffective detection of potential market abuse, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), the UK's regulatory watchdog, fined BGC Brokers LP and two GFI Group subsidiaries, GFI Brokers Limited and GFI Securities Limited.

Due to inadequate control systems and ineffective detection of potential market abuse, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), the UK's regulatory watchdog, fined BGC Brokers LP and two GFI Group subsidiaries, GFI Brokers Limited and GFI Securities Limited, a total of £4,775,200.
According to the FCA, the inter-dealer brokers did not put the Market Abuse Regulation's (MAR) requirements for trade surveillance into practise. The failure to enforce appropriate frameworks has resulted in a significant increase in the risk of suspicious trading activity going undetected.
Trading firms, in the nearly two-year period between 2016 and 2018, used flawed and ineffective surveillance procedures that were unable to adequately address market abuse. Moreover, BGC and GFI systems did not cover all asset classes under MAR.
Upon evaluating the profiles of these companies in question, WikiFX discovered that they have low Wikiscore which translates into their high underlying risk and low credibility.\



“Oversight of our markets is a regulated partnership between the FCA and market participants, and so gaps or holes in a firm's ability to monitor and detect abusive trading poses direct risks to market integrity. This case is another example of the FCA's determination to ensure firms prioritise market integrity and the maintenance of high standards of compliance,” Mark Steward, the Executive Director of Enforcement and Market Oversight at FCA, commented.
The Executive Director of Enforcement and Market Oversight at FCA, Mark Steward, explained that “oversight of our markets is a regulated partnership between the FCA and market participants, and so gaps or holes in a firm's ability to monitor and detect abusive trading poses direct risks to market integrity. This case is another example of the FCA's determination to ensure firms prioritise market integrity and the maintenance of high standards of compliance.”
MAR was established six years ago, strengthening the standards for reporting and detecting market abuse. It includes a duty to keep an eye on orders and transactions to spot possible fraud efforts.
The FCA performs self-supervision of misuse by collecting data from all players in the regulated market. A specific market surveillance team controls the suspicious transaction and order reporting (STOR) regime. As part of its mandate, it carries out ad hoc checks among market participants to assess whether they control potential market abuses.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Related broker
Read more

Fidelity Exposed: Traders Complain About Withdrawal Denials, Frozen Accounts & Platform Glitches
Does Fidelity Investments prevent you from accessing funds despite numerous assurances on your requests? Do you witness an account freeze by the US-based forex broker every time you request withdrawal access? Do you struggle with an unstable trading platform here? Is the slow Fidelity customer service making you face forced liquidation? These issues haunt traders, with many of them voicing their frustration on several broker review platforms such as WikiFX. In this Fidelity review article, we have shared quite a few complaints for you to look at. Read on!

Exposing The Trading Pit: Traders Blame the Broker for Unfair Withdrawal Denials & Account Blocks
Did you receive contradictory emails from The Trading Pit, with one approving payout and another rejecting it, citing trading rule violations? Did you purchase multiple trading accounts but receive a payout on only one of them? Did The Trading Pit prop firm refund you for the remaining accounts without clear reasoning? Did you face account bans despite using limited margins and keeping investment risks to a minimum? These are some raging complaints found under The Trading Pit review. We will share some of these complaints in this article. Take a look.

M&G Review: Traders Report Fund Scams, Misleading Market Info & False Return Promises
Applying for multiple withdrawals at M&G Investments but not getting it into your bank account? Do you see the uncredited withdrawal funds out of your forex trading account on the M&G login? Does the customer support service fail to address this trading issue? Does the misleading market information provided on this forex broker’s trading platform make you lose all your invested capital? Were you lured into investing under the promise of guaranteed forex returns? These issues have become highly common for traders at M&G Investments. In this M&G review article, we have echoed investor sentiments through their complaint screenshots. Take a look!

INZO Broker MT5 Review 2025: A Trader's Guide to Features, Fees and Risks
INZO is a foreign exchange (Forex) and Contracts for Difference (CFD) brokerage company that started working in 2021. The company is registered in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines and regulated offshore. It focuses on serving clients around the world by giving them access to popular trading platforms, especially MetaTrader 5 (MT5) and cTrader. The company offers different types of trading instruments, from currency pairs to cryptocurrencies. It aims to help both new and experienced traders. Read on to know more about it.
