简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Aerojet investors poised to back CEO in board challenge from exec chair
Abstract:Aerojet Rocketdyne shareholders are poised to elect a group of directors headed by the company’s chief executive in a bitterly fought election where the company’s executive chairman also sought control of the board, people familiar with the matter said on Wednesday.

Chief executive Eileen Drake and Warren Lichtenstein, the executive chairman, each nominated eight director candidates for election to the U.S. rocket makers board.
The two have been battling each other since the collapse of a planned $4.4 billion merger with Lockheed Martin Corp earlier this year and both have sued each other in Delaware court.
The sources requested anonymity to discuss the likely outcome of the shareholder vote before an official announcement by the company. The meeting is being held on Thursday and investors could still vote or change their votes until the meeting begins.
Representatives for the company and for Lichtenstein could not be reached for comment.
Lichtenstein, whose Steel Partners and affiliates own more than 5% of the company, argued operational improvements and changes to capital allocation were needed to help push up the companys share price to attract new buyers. He also wanted to bring back Mark Tucker, a former Aerojet chief operating officer, as CEO.
But the major proxy advisory firms, ISS and Glass Lewis, recommended investors back Drakes slate and end the current standoff. ISS argued there is not enough evidence to suggest Drake must be replaced and that Lichtenstein should not serve on the board at this point.
Glass Lewis praised Drake for having put together a well-rounded slate of candidates and said the company generally performed during her tenure.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Grand Capital Doesn’t Feel GRAND for Traders with Withdrawal Denials & Long Processing Times
The trading environment does not seem that rosy for traders at Grand Capital, a Seychelles-based forex broker. Traders’ requests for withdrawals are alleged to be in the review process for months, making them frustrated and helpless. Despite meeting the guidelines, traders find it hard to withdraw funds, as suggested by their complaints online. What’s also troubling traders are long processing times concerning Grand Capital withdrawals. In this Grand Capital review segment, we have shared some complaints for you to look at. Read on!

EmiraX Markets Withdrawal Issues Exposed
EmiraX Markets Review reveals unregulated status, fake license claims, and withdrawal issues. Stay safe and avoid this broker.

ADSS Review: Traders Say NO to Trading B’coz of Withdrawal Blocks, Account Freeze & Trade Issues
Does ADSS give you plenty of excuses to deny you access to withdrawals? Is your withdrawal request pending for months or years? Do you witness account freezes from the United Arab Emirates-based forex broker? Do you struggle to open and close your forex positions on the ADSS app? Does the customer support service fail to respond to your trading queries? All these issues have become a rage online. In this ADSS Broker review article, we have highlighted actual trader wordings on these issues. Keep reading!

INGOT Brokers Regulation 2025: ASIC vs Offshore License - What Traders Must Know
Explore INGOT Brokers regulation in 2025: Compare their ASIC and Seychelles FSA licenses, understand trader protection levels, and learn about potential risks in this detailed guide.
