WikiFX Spring Festival Message | Grounded in Transparency, Walking with Trust
As the Lunar New Year approaches, renewal is in the air. It is a moment to bid farewell to the old, welcome the new, and reflect while moving forward.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:Rumors circulating in the French broking industry imply that Willis Towers Watson (WTW) may be considering selling its Gras Savoye unit ahead of its proposed merger with Aon, according to L'argus de l'assurance.

According to L‘argus de l’assurance, rumors circulating in the French broking market suggest that Willis Towers Watson (WTW) could be considering a sale of its Gras Savoye unit ahead of its planned merger with Aon.
The proposed combination of the broking giants is currently under investigation by regulators, with concerns centering around potential competition issues.
For some time now, its been suggested that WTW may have to look at a sale of its reinsurance broking arm, Willis Re, in order for the merger to meet regulatory requirements.
But sources at L‘argus de l’assurance have said that the divestiture of Willis Re may not go far enough for European authorities, which has led to speculation that Gras Savoye could also be on the table.
The publication notes that the French brokerage is a strong regional asset for WTW with a turnover of €517 million in 2019 and a high penetration rate among French SMEs, meaning its likely to garner strong interest from potential buyers.
But more than this, its thought that the sale could be a fairly painless process for WTW, as sources say Gras Savoye has remained relatively independent from WTW since its acquisition in 2016, including “completely separate” information systems.
These reports are based on the understanding that Aon and WTW will have to make €1.5 billion ($1.8 billion) worth of divestitures prior to their merger to meet the standards of the European competition directorate.
As we previously reported, the sale of Willis Re alone is only expected to fulfill €970 million ($1.15 billion) of that quota, meaning further sales would be required to satisfy European regulators.
Earlier this month, WTW completed the sale of its specialist broking arm, Miller, to Cinven and GIC, in what some have viewed as another move to avoid competition challenges.
Its thought that the European Commission may soon be ready to publicly voice its antitrust concerns via a statement of objections, a charge sheet explaining potential competitive harm as a result of the mega-merger.
However, the merger is also under scrutiny by other international regulators, with recent reports suggesting that the US Department of Justice may have antitrust concerns about the reinsurance aspect of the deal, as well as in other areas like benefits and large corporate clients.
Likewise, the Australian Competition & Consumer Commission (ACCC) has warned that the merger could “significantly lessen competition” in Australia following similar statements from New Zealand authorities.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

As the Lunar New Year approaches, renewal is in the air. It is a moment to bid farewell to the old, welcome the new, and reflect while moving forward.

XSpot Wealth has found many negative comments from traders who have allegedly been deceived by the broker. Traders constantly accuse the broker of causing unnecessary withdrawal blocks and forcing them to continue depositing with it. Many user complaints emerged on WikiFX, a leading global forex regulation inquiry app. In this XSpot Wealth review article, we have investigated multiple complaints against the broker. Read on!

Did SEVEN STAR FX make unreasonable verification requests and block your forex trading account later? Did the broker prevent you from accessing fund withdrawals? Were you made to wait for a long time to receive a response from the broker’s customer support official? Have you had to seek legal assistance to recover your stuck funds? Well, these are some claims made by SEVEN STAR FX’s traders. In this SEVEN STAR FX review article, we have looked closely at the company’s operation, the list of complaints, and a take on its regulatory status. Keep reading to know the same.

When traders search for "Is ZarVista Safe or Scam," they want to know if their capital will be safe. Nice features and bonuses do not matter much if you can't trust the broker. This article skips the marketing talk and looks at real evidence about ZarVista's reputation. We want to examine actual user reviews, look into the many ZarVista Complaints, and check the broker's legal status to get a clear picture. The evidence we found shows serious warning signs and a pattern of major user problems, especially about the safety and access to funds. This report gives you the information you need to make a smart decision about this risky broker.