简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Apple defeats copyright lawsuit over racially diverse emoji
Abstract:Apple Inc convinced a California federal judge on Wednesday to throw out a lawsuit accusing the tech giant of ripping off another companys multiracial emoji and violating its intellectual property rights.

Cub Club Investment LLC didnt show that Apple copied anything that was eligible for copyright protection, U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria said.
Chhabria gave Cub Club a chance to amend its lawsuit but said he was “skeptical” it could succeed based on several differences between its emoji design and Apples.
Texas-based Cub Club‘s 2020 lawsuit said that its founder Katrina Parrott created and launched the “iDiversicons” app in 2013, calling it the world’s first emoji with diverse skin tones.
Cub Club said Parrott discussed a potential partnership with Apple representatives in 2014, and that Apple created its own set of multiracial emoji after declining to work with her. It said Apple‘s emoji infringed its copyrights and trademark rights, arguing they copied iDiversicons’ five skin tones and other features.
Chhabria said in a Wednesday order that even if the complaint was true, Apple at most copied Cub Clubs unprotectable “idea” of diverse emoji.
“There arent many ways that someone could implement this idea,” Chhabria said. “After all, there are only so many ways to draw a thumbs up.”
Cub Club only owns weak copyrights in the unique expressive aspects of its designs, and Apple‘s emojis weren’t similar enough to infringe them, Chhabria said, citing differences in their coloring, shapes, and other features.
Chhabria also found that Cub Club didnt have protectable trademark rights for its emoji.
Apple and attorneys for both companies did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
The case is Cub Club Investment LLC v. Apple Inc, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, No. 3:21-cv-06948.
For Cub Club: Todd Patterson of Patterson + Sheridan
For Apple: Andrew Gass of Latham & Watkins

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Inzo Broker Review 2025: Is It Legit or a High-Risk Gamble?
When you ask, "Is inzo broker legit?" you want a clear, straight answer before putting your money at risk. The truth about Inzo Broker is complicated. Finding out if it's legitimate means looking carefully at its rules, trading setup, and most importantly, the real experiences of traders who have used it. The broker shows a mixed picture - it has official paperwork from an offshore regulator, but it also has many user warnings about how it operates. This review gives you a fair and fact-based investigation. We will break down all the information we can find, from company records to serious user complaints, so you can make your own clear decision.

Uniglobe Markets Review 2025: A Complete Guide to an Unregulated Broker
Uniglobe Markets claims to be an online trading company that offers many different types of investments, including foreign currency and raw materials. The company tries to attract traders by offering high leverage, different account options, and popular MetaTrader trading software. However, there is one major problem: the company does not have proper regulatory oversight. This creates serious concerns about the safety of clients’ capital and whether the company operates honestly. Read on to learn more about its regulatory status.

The 5%ers Review: Is it a Scam or Legit? Find Out from These Trader Comments
Did you face reduced leverage and hiked fees without any explanation from The 5%ers broker? Do you find The 5%er rules strange for getting a funded account from this prop trading firm? Has the broker closed your trade inappropriately, preventing you from making gains in the forex market? All these allegations have dominated The 5%ers review segment online. Looking at this, the WikiFX team investigated and found some startling comments against the broker. In this article, we have shared those complaints. Read on!

Inzo Broker Review 2025: A Complete Look at Features, Costs and User Claims
Inzo Broker presents itself as a modern forex and CFD broker, started in 2021 and registered in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. At first glance, it offers an attractive package for traders: access to the popular MetaTrader 5 (MT5) and cTrader platforms, different types of accounts for various budget levels, and a wide selection of assets to trade. These features are made to attract both new and experienced traders. However, a closer look shows a big difference between these advertised benefits and the real risks. The broker works under an offshore regulatory system, which gives limited protection to investors. More importantly, Inzo has collected many serious user complaints, especially about withdrawing funds and changing trading conditions unfairly. This mix of weak oversight and serious user claims creates a high-risk situation that potential clients must carefully think about. This review will break down these parts to give a clear, fact-based view.
