Contractor Loses RM356,000 in “Marinasand” Investment Scam
A contractor in Pahang has suffered a devastating financial loss of more than RM356,000 after becoming entangled in an online investment scam named “Marinasand”.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:Thirty-six Chinese nationals were charged in a Malaysian court for allegedly running an online call centre that scammed victims into non-existent investment schemes, with bail denied due to flight risk and ongoing investigations.

Thirty-six Chinese nationals have been jointly charged at the Magistrates Court here for allegedly conspiring to cheat their fellow countrymen through non-existent investment schemes.
The accused, aged between 22 and 39, were brought before Magistrate Mohd Farez Rahman on Tuesday (Sept 2). No plea was recorded as they were unable to understand Bahasa Malaysia. Five of those charged are women.
According to the charge, the group is accused of operating an online call centre from a house in Taman Tanjung, near here, to scam Chinese nationals into investing in bogus schemes. The offence was allegedly committed at around 3.30pm on Aug 21.

They are charged under Section 420 of the Penal Code, read together with Section 120B(2), which covers criminal conspiracy. If found guilty, they face a jail term of up to six months, a fine, or both.
Lawyer Chang Kai Ping, representing the accused, applied for bail, arguing that his clients had already been held in police custody for 13 days.
However, deputy public prosecutor Azriff Firdaus Mohamad Ali objected, saying the accused posed a flight risk. He told the court that checks with the Immigration Department showed that the accused either had expired travel passes or none at all. He added that the authorities had also received a letter from the Chinese embassy stating that the accuseds travel documents had been revoked due to offences committed in their home country.
Azriff further pointed out that the accused had failed to provide any documents to explain what they were doing in Malaysia, nor could they give the court the address of any relatives or local contacts.
In delivering his decision, Magistrate Mohd Farez said that for a foreigner to be granted bail, several conditions must be met, including having valid travel documents, a local address and two local sureties.
“Since none of these conditions have been fulfilled, bail is denied,” he said, adding that the accused were clearly a flight risk.
The court fixed Sept 12 for mention and to arrange for a Mandarin interpreter.
During the raid on Aug 21, police also seized 94 mobile phones, 36 laptops and other related items, with the total value estimated at around RM220,000.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

A contractor in Pahang has suffered a devastating financial loss of more than RM356,000 after becoming entangled in an online investment scam named “Marinasand”.

A civil servant in Kuantan has lost more than RM160,000 after falling victim to a fraudulent investment scheme known as “Future Funds”.

Malaysians lost approximately RM2.77 billion to scams in 2025. In 2026, let us not repeat the same mistakes again!

Criticism has emerged within the cryptocurrency industry following reports alleging that Kampanat Wimonnot, a former Web3 fund executive, was involved in a fraudulent investment scheme involving fake pre-token deals linked to well-known blockchain projects. According to the allegations, the scheme used documents and information that were claimed to be fabricated in order to create the appearance of legitimacy and attract investors. At least 24 victims from multiple countries have reportedly been affected, with losses ranging from tens of thousands of dollars to more than US$1 million. The incident highlights the risks associated with private allocation crypto deals and underscores the importance for investors to verify information directly with the originating project before making any investment decisions.