简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
FXTRADING Financial Focus (01/30)U.S. Gov Policy Disputes Persist, Shutdown Alarm Sounded Again
Abstract:The tug-of-war in the U.S. Congress over government funding and immigration enforcement is accelerating as the deadline looms. With funding arrangements for the remainder of the fiscal year still unre

The tug-of-war in the U.S. Congress over government funding and immigration enforcement is accelerating as the deadline looms. With funding arrangements for the remainder of the fiscal year still unresolved, political wrangling within the Senate has intensified, particularly over the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) budget and approaches to immigration enforcement. If related legislation is not passed in time, some federal agencies face a shutdown risk this weekend, pressuring both parties back to the negotiating table.
Against this backdrop, U.S. officials revealed that President Trump and Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer advanced a new round of discussions on Wednesday evening, seeking a compromise to break the deadlock. The core idea centers on separating DHS funding from the broader fiscal package to prevent it from becoming a bottleneck that hampers overall government operations, thereby clearing the path for funding other key departments.
Under the current discussion framework, the Senate was originally expected to process a consolidated proposal covering six appropriation bills, impacting military spending, healthcare programs, and the functioning of multiple federal agencies. If DHS funding is removed from the package, the remaining portions may pass more swiftly, reducing the likelihood of a full or partial government shutdown.
Time pressure is mounting rapidly. The Senate must complete the legislative process by midnight Friday, or agencies such as the Transportation Security Administration (TSA), the Coast Guard, and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) may be forced to scale back operations due to funding lapses. To avoid this, Congress is also considering a short-term stopgap measure to maintain basic DHS operations and provide breathing room for continued negotiations.
The Democratic stance remains firm. They have made it clear that unless the Trump administration agrees to impose new constraints on immigration enforcement practices, they will not support extending DHS funding through September. Previously, Democrats had openly called for greater oversight of immigration enforcement agencies—a position that has pushed the government to the brink of a shutdown this weekend.
The immediate flashpoint stems from a recent enforcement incident. Last Saturday, a U.S. citizen was killed during an immigration enforcement operation in Minneapolis, sparking public outrage. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Border Patrol have since faced widespread criticism, with mounting demands for increased transparency and accountability. Schumer subsequently proposed that DHS enforcement officers cease wearing face masks, be uniformly equipped with body cameras, and follow the same use-of-force standards as local police departments.
From FXTRADINGs perspective, the short-term impact of this political standoff is not confined to Washington. Repeated elevation of government shutdown risks tends to amplify market concerns over U.S. policy stability, thereby affecting the U.S. dollar and risk asset sentiment. If a stopgap funding measure passes smoothly, markets may experience temporary relief; however, the structural disputes over immigration policy and enforcement authority remain unresolved. This suggests that policy uncertainty could continue to intensify over the coming weeks, posing an ongoing source of volatility for global markets.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
