Mazi Finance Scam Exposure: A Warning to Indian Traders
Latest India Mazi Finance scam: Failed XAUUSD execution despite margin, costing $675—fake “insufficient balance” excuse. Protect funds, read the full report now!
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:Trading Pro Review for 2026 with updated data on licenses, leverage, and user complaints from Malaysia, Indonesia, and beyond. Read our verdict now.

Trading Pro Review exposes the troubling reality behind this broker‘s operations. Trading Pro, which is regulated by South Africa’s FSCA, has attracted traders across Malaysia, Indonesia, and other regions with promises of high leverage, multiple platforms, and low spreads. Yet beneath the polished image lies a pattern of complaints, questionable regulatory standing, and serious withdrawal issues. This Trading Pro Review highlights the risks, inconsistencies, and scam alerts tied to the broker. With leverage reaching 1:2000, offshore registrations, and mounting user grievances, Trading Pro poses significant dangers to unsuspecting investors. The urgency of this review lies in protecting traders from misleading claims and financial harm. By analyzing licenses, operational practices, and real user experiences, this article provides a clear verdict: Trading Pro is not the safe choice it markets itself to be.
Trading Pro presents itself as regulated under the Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) in South Africa, with license number 49624. On paper, this suggests legitimacy. However, field investigations reveal inconsistencies. A reported office in Durban, South Africa, could not be verified, casting doubt on the broker's physical presence.

Further scrutiny shows that Trading Pro International Limited is registered in Mauritius and regulated by the Financial Services Commission (FSC). Offshore regulation is notoriously weaker than tier-one jurisdictions, offering limited investor protection. The dual claims of FSCA regulation and offshore registration create confusion, leaving traders unsure which authority actually oversees the broker.
This regulatory ambiguity is a red flag. While Trading Pro advertises compliance, its operational reality suggests reliance on offshore loopholes rather than robust oversight.
Trading Pros' credibility takes another hit with its WikiFX score of just 2.33/10. Such a low rating signals systemic issues. WikiFX, which evaluates brokers based on licensing, transparency, and user complaints, explicitly warns traders to avoid Trading Pro.
The score reflects multiple factors:
A broker with such a low score cannot be considered safe, regardless of its marketing claims.
Trading Pro offers MT4, MT5, and cTrader platforms, appealing to both novice and experienced traders. It advertises four account types—Micro, Rookie, Pro, and Scalpx—with minimum deposits ranging from $1 to $50.
Key account features include:
While these features appear attractive, they mask underlying risks. High leverage is dangerous, especially for inexperienced traders, as it amplifies losses. The low minimum deposit attracts beginners, but the reported withdrawal issues make these accounts hazardous.

Trading Pro claims instant deposits and withdrawals processed within one working day. Supported methods include Visa/Mastercard, FasaPay, Paytrust, crypto, and regional systems like Dragonpay in the Philippines.
Yet user experiences contradict these promises:
These repeated issues highlight a pattern of obstruction. Traders report that profits are being removed or that accounts are being flagged for alleged violations, undermining trust in the broker's financial integrity.
The most damning evidence against Trading Pro comes from user complaints across Malaysia, Indonesia, and beyond.
Examples include:
These cases reveal a consistent pattern: Trading Pro obstructs withdrawals, manipulates accounts, and fails to honor trader profits.
Trading Pros' registration in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines further undermines its credibility. Offshore jurisdictions often lack stringent oversight, allowing brokers to operate with minimal accountability.
Key risks of offshore registration include:
For Malaysian and Indonesian traders, this means deposits are at risk, with little chance of recovery if disputes arise.
Trading Pros' leverage of 1:2000 is among the highest in the industry. While marketed as an opportunity for higher profits, such leverage is extremely risky.
Consider this:
High leverage is often used by questionable brokers to attract clients, but it exposes traders to catastrophic risks.
Despite offering MT4 and MT5, users report frequent platform freezes and execution delays. Complaints include:
These technical issues suggest poor infrastructure or deliberate manipulation, both of which compromise trading integrity.
Trading Pro aggressively markets bonuses, copy trading, and PAMM accounts. At expos, it offers 100% credit bonuses to lure traders. However, these promotions often come with hidden conditions.
Traders report that profits earned with bonuses are later removed, and their accounts are flagged for violations. Such tactics exploit inexperienced traders, creating false expectations of easy profits.
Trading Pros' presence in Malaysia and Indonesia is particularly concerning. Multiple complaints from these regions highlight withdrawal failures and inaccessible platforms.
For example:
These cases show that Trading Pros risks are not isolated but widespread across Southeast Asia.
Trading Pro‘s domain, tradingpro.com, was registered in 1999 and updated in 2024. While longevity might suggest stability, the broker’s operational practices contradict this.
The company operates under multiple names: Trading Pro International (PTY) LTD in South Africa and Trading Pro International Limited in Mauritius. Such fragmented identities raise transparency concerns.
Pros:
Cons:
The cons outweigh the pros, especially when financial safety is at stake.
While Trading Pro claims FSCA regulation, its offshore registration and mounting complaints suggest otherwise. A legitimate broker should provide transparent operations, reliable withdrawals, and consistent platform performance. Trading Pro fails on all counts.
Trading Pro Review reveals a broker riddled with red flags. Despite claims of regulation and advanced platforms, the reality is offshore registration, high-risk leverage, and widespread withdrawal issues. Complaints from Malaysia, Indonesia, and other regions confirm a pattern of obstruction and manipulation.
Actionable Advice:
Trading Pro is not a safe choice. Investors should protect themselves by avoiding this broker and opting for regulated alternatives with proven credibility.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

Latest India Mazi Finance scam: Failed XAUUSD execution despite margin, costing $675—fake “insufficient balance” excuse. Protect funds, read the full report now!

Does Pemaxx prevent you from withdrawing funds once you make profits? Has the Mauritius-based forex broker disabled your trading account upon your withdrawal request? Do you fail to withdraw funds despite meeting the trading lot requirements? These scam-like trading activities have allegedly become a part of the broker’s operation, as many traders have complained about them online. In this Pemaxx review article, we have highlighted their comments against the forex broker. Keep reading!

Did Fortune Prime Global deduct all your profits by accusing you of market manipulation? Are you struggling to access withdrawals for months? Has the forex broker disabled your forex trading account upon the withdrawal application? Does the broker stipulate tax payments as a condition for fund withdrawals? You are not alone! In this Fortune Prime Global review article, we have highlighted these complaints. Read on!

UNIGLOBEMARKET presents a mixed picture that demands careful consideration from prospective traders, earning an overall rating of 5.5 out of 10 with a "Use with Caution" designation. Based on 55 trader reviews, the broker shows a concerning 40% negative rate, though it's worth noting that positive reviews still outnumber negative ones with 31 favorable assessments compared to 22 unfavorable ones. Read on for an insightful review.