Volopa Review (2025): Is it Safe or a Scam?

When evaluating a financial service provider, the most critical metric is its safety score. Volopa currently holds a significantly low WikiFX Score of 1.58 out of 10. This abysmal rating serves as an immediate warning signal for investors. In the world of online trading and finance, a score below 2.0 is statistically correlated with unregulated platforms, high-risk entities, and potential scams.

While Volopa claims to operate out of the United Kingdom, a jurisdiction known for rigorous financial oversight, our data suggests a disconnect between their claims and their actual regulatory standing. This review analyzes Volopas regulatory status, trading environment, and hidden risks to determine if your funds are safe.

Regulatory Status and License Check

The cornerstone of investor protection is a valid license from a reputable authority. For a broker based in the UK, this means regulation by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA).

The Verdict: Unverified Regulation

According to the latest WikiFX database check, Volopas regulatory status is classified as “Unverified.”

While the broker is headquartered in the UK (established in 2018), it does not hold a valid, verified license to operate as a financial intermediary for retail traders under its own brand in the capacity expected of a standard forex or CFD broker.

Key Regulatory findings:

• Regulator Checked: Financial Conduct Authority (UK FCA).
• License Number in Question: 531771.
• Current Status:Unverified / Suspected Unauthorized.
• Organization Name Mismatch: The license number 531771 is legally associated with a company named “XPRIME MARKETS LIMITED,” not directly “Volopa Capital” in the context of the brokerage services analyzed.

Why This Is Dangerous

The “Unverified” status is critical. In the UK, the FCA enforces strict rules to protect clients, including:

1. Segregated Accounts: Client money must be kept separate from the company's operating funds.
2. FSCS Protection: If a regulated broker goes bankrupt, the Financial Services Compensation Scheme protects traders up to £85,000.
3. Negative Balance Protection: Ensuring you cannot lose more than your initial deposit.

Since Volopa lacks verified FCA authorization for these specific trading activities, none of these protections are guaranteed. If the platform were to become insolvent or vanish, investors would likely have no legal recourse to recover their capital. The lack of a verified license removes the “safety net” that legitimate trading requires.

Trading Conditions and Transparency

A legitimate broker prides itself on transparency regarding leverage, spreads, and software. However, Volopa displays a concerning lack of public data regarding its trading environment.

The “Black Box” Approach

WikiFX data indicating “Null” values across key metrics suggests that Volopa is opaque about its costs.

• Leverage: No data available. Genuine UK brokers are capped at 1:30 leverage for retail clients. Unregulated entities often offer illegal leverage (e.g., 1:500) to tempt traders into losing funds faster.
• Spreads and Commissions: Undisclosed. Without clear spread data, traders cannot calculate their transaction costs, making it easy for the platform to manipulate pricing behind the scenes.
• Trading Software: There is no confirmed support for industry-standard platforms like MetaTrader 4 (MT4) or MetaTrader 5 (MT5). This usually forces users to use a proprietary web-based platform, which is often easier for a broker to manipulate than third-party software.

Customer Service Limitations

While Volopa provides a UK-based phone number (+44 (0) 203 752 3813) and supports English, having a phone line does not legitimize a brokerage. Scammers often use VoIP services to mimic local numbers. Furthermore, reports indicate that while they do respond, wait times can be significant. A slow response time is a major risk factor during periods of market volatility when you need immediate assistance with your funds.

Hidden Risks: Analyzing the Silence

Although the WikiFX Exposure Center has not yet received verified complaints detailing specific scams (such as withdrawal denials) for Volopa, this silence should not be interpreted as safety.

The “Low Score” Hazard

A score of 1.58 is not assigned randomly. It reflects a comprehensive algorithm that considers license validity, business sustainability, and regulatory compliance. Even in the absence of user complaints, the low score suggests:

1. Compliance Failures: The broker may fail to meet capital adequacy requirements.
2. Operational Risk: Without oversight, the internal risk management of the company is unknown.
3. Potential for Future Issues: Many low-scoring platforms operate “normally” for a period to gather deposits before issues with withdrawals begin to surface.

The combination of an “E” Influence Rank and a lack of verified regulation suggests that Volopa is not a mainstream, vetted provider. It operates on the fringes of the financial market, which is where the highest risk of capital loss exists.

Conclusion: Is Volopa Recommended?

Based on the evidence—specifically the Unverified Regulatory Status and the critically low WikiFX Score of 1.58—we do not recommend trading with Volopa.

The platform fails to provide the necessary proof of safety required for a financial service provider in 2025. The absence of a verified FCA license exposes clients to unlimited risk, including the potential total loss of funds with no government-backed compensation.

Verdict:High Risk / Avoid

Recommendation: Investors should prioritize brokers with a WikiFX Score above 7.0 that hold verified licenses from top-tier regulators like the FCA (UK), ASIC (Australia), or NFA (USA).

To protect your capital and verify the real-time status of any broker, use the WikiFX App to check for updated licenses and clone warnings before depositing.