简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Monzo Fined £21M: FCA Slams Bank Over High-Risk Accounts Breach
Abstract:The FCA fines Monzo £21M for anti-money laundering failures, citing high-risk account breaches and systemic control failures. Discover Monzo’s response and improvements.

Monzo Bank Ltd has been hit with a £21,091,300 fine from the UK‘s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) for serious lapses in its anti-financial crime controls between October 2018 and August 2020. This penalty underscores Monzo’s failure to keep its financial crime defenses robust during a period of explosive growth, a misstep that exposed the bank to significant risks. The FCA has been cracking down on UK banks for anti-money laundering (AML) shortcomings, and Monzos case stands out due to its rapidly expanding customer base, which jumped from 600,000 in 2018 to over 12 million today.
The Monzo FCA fine 2025 highlights why banks and financial institutions must prioritize airtight financial crime controls, especially as their customer numbers soar. Monzo struggled to scale its systems to match its growth, leaving gaps that could have allowed financial crime to slip through.
What Went Wrong with Monzos Financial Crime Controls?
The FCA‘s investigation found Monzo’s financial crime systems weren‘t up to the task of handling its rapid expansion. The bank’s customer onboarding process was shaky, with some customers listing implausible addresses—like famous London landmarks—without proper scrutiny. Worse, Monzos risk assessment systems failed to flag high-risk customers. Between August 2020 and June 2022, the bank breached FCA rules by opening accounts for over 34,000 high-risk customers, despite a clear ban on doing so.
This breakdown in Monzos financial crime controls exposed the challenges digital banks face in balancing growth with compliance, particularly in customer onboarding and transaction monitoring.

FCAs Crackdown on Anti-Money Laundering Failures
Monzo‘s fine is part of a broader FCA push to hold UK banks accountable for weak anti-money laundering systems. Over the past four years, the FCA has fined ten financial institutions, with Monzo being the latest. The regulator is intensifying efforts to stop illicit money from flowing through the financial system, and Monzo’s case shows why. Therese Chambers, FCAs joint executive director of enforcement, put it bluntly: “Banks are a vital line of defense against financial crime. Monzo fell far short of what we, and society, expect.”
By allowing high-risk accounts to slip through, Monzo opened the door to potential money laundering and other illegal activities, a critical failure in its financial crime prevention strategy.
Monzos Response and Steps Toward Compliance
Monzo‘s CEO, TS Anil, acknowledged the FCA’s findings but stressed that the issues were historical, tied to a period ending three years ago. Since then, Monzo has rolled out major upgrades to its financial crime controls through a comprehensive change program. These efforts focus on strengthening anti-money laundering systems, improving customer onboarding, and enhancing risk assessment and transaction monitoring.
Monzo has poured resources into technology and staffing to address the FCAs concerns, following recommendations from an independent review. The bank is now working to position itself as a leader in managing financial crime risks, with a sharp focus on AML compliance.
Financial Crime in the Digital Banking Era
Monzo‘s fine is a wake-up call for digital banks navigating the fight against financial crime. As more people flock to online banking, the risks grow alongside customer numbers. Monzo’s leap from 600,000 to over 12 million customers in just a few years shows how fast digital banks are scaling—and how hard it is to keep compliance systems up to speed.
Criminals are increasingly targeting digital financial systems, so banks like Monzo must stay ahead with innovative anti-money laundering measures. Robust systems are critical to balancing growth with security and compliance.
Moving Forward
The Monzo FCA fine of 2025 serves as a sharp reminder that financial crime controls cant lag behind growth. Monzo has made significant strides in fixing its anti-money laundering systems, and these improvements aim to rebuild trust and strengthen compliance. Still, this case is a broader lesson for digital banks: staying vigilant against financial crime is non-negotiable. As the digital banking world evolves, so must the strategies to keep criminals at bay, ensuring robust systems protect both banks and their customers.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

JP Markets Review: High Spread & Commission, Fake Bonus Lure & Withdrawal Hassles Frustrate Traders
Have you been lured into opening a JP Markets Forex Trading Account with a high bonus offer that never existed? Have you found the spread and commission charges higher on JP Markets Login than what’s advertised on the broker’s website? Wondering why you are not able to withdraw funds from your trading account? Well, all of these hint at a potential forex investment scam. Many traders have expressed their disappointment while sharing the JP Markets Review online. In this article, we have shared certain complaints. Take a look at them.

Exclusive Markets Under the Scanner: Traders Report High Swap Charges, Deposit Discrepancies & More
Is your forex trading account experience at Exclusive Markets far from good? Do you witness high swap fees and daily charges? Does the deposit fail to reflect in your Exclusive Markets Login? Don’t receive adequate response from the customer support official on your trading queries? You are not alone! Traders have already alleged that the forex broker is involved in these activities. In this Exclusive Markets WikiFX review article, we shared some traders’ comments. Read on to know about them.

Is Nash Markets Regulated or Risk? Truth About Nash Markets’ License & Withdrawal Issues
Nash Markets’ app is said to be a scam. The broker locked users’ accounts after they got verified and did not return their deposit money. Many real users have shared these complaints and reviews. In this 2025 Nash Markets review, you will read about the main complaints and real experiences from users.

Firsttrade Review: Traders Raise Ponzi-Style Scam Concerns, Withdrawal Denials & More Issues
Have you lost all your capital while trading via Firsttrade? Does the US-based forex broker disallow you from withdrawing funds? Do you have to pay massive fees when transferring funds? Does your trade get affected because of frequent malfunction in the trading app? These have been haunting many traders at Firsttrade. Consequently, many of them have raised complaints online. In this Firsttrade review, we have shared such complaints. Keep reading to know about them.
