Retiree loses over RM337,000 in Facebook investment scam
Authorities warn public to verify financial transactions as pensioner duped by fake online investment
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:SEC charges Unicoin and executives with $100M fraud, alleging fake real estate backing and inflated token sale claims. Lawsuit seeks penalties.

On Tuesday, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) launched a lawsuit against Unicoin, a cryptocurrency company, and three of its leaders, accusing them of a scam that tricked investors out of over $100 million. The SEC pointed fingers at Unicoins CEO Alexander Konanykhin, former board chair Maria Moschini, senior vice president and lawyer Richard Devlin, and former investment officer Alejandro Dominguez, saying they broke securities laws.
The SECs court filing claims Unicoin lied about owning real estate to back its crypto tokens. From September 2023 to January 2024, the company bragged about buying properties in Argentina, Thailand, Antigua, and the Bahamas, saying they were worth over $1.4 billion. The SEC says most of these deals never happened, and the properties were worth only about $300 million. This made investors think their money was safer than it was.

The SEC also says Unicoin fudged its fundraising numbers. The company told people it raised $3 billion by selling “rights certificates” by June 2024, but it only collected $110 million. The executives allegedly hyped up these false numbers on social media and elsewhere to make Unicoin seem more successful and draw in more investors.
Unicoin‘s marketing was flashy and bold. The SEC noted ads on taxis, ferries, elevator screens in office buildings, digital billboards, drink coasters, TV shows, news sites, and even public Wi-Fi spots. These ads promised huge profits, with some claiming investors could make up to 9 million percent, comparing Unicoin to Bitcoin’s massive growth. Social media posts urged people to “jump in early with Unicoin,” hinting it could turn small investors into millionaires, just like Bitcoin did for some.
Trouble started brewing last December when Unicoin got a Wells notice from the SEC, then led by Chair Gary Gensler, warning of coming fraud charges. In April, Konanykhin wrote to Unicoin‘s shareholders, saying the company turned down an SEC offer to settle. He called it an “ultimatum” with demands he wouldn’t accept. In a CoinDesk interview, he claimed the SEC‘s investigation hurt Unicoin to the tune of billions, but didn’t share specifics.
Unicoin and its leaders havent commented on the latest lawsuit. Earlier this year, after a Wall Street Journal story, a spokesperson said Unicoin was the only crypto company fully registered, regulated, audited, and reporting publicly in the U.S., insisting it followed all rules. The SEC disagrees and wants the company to pay back profits and face fines for the alleged wrongdoing.
This case is part of a bigger push by regulators to crack down on crypto companies making shady promises or selling unregistered securities. It highlights the dangers investors face in the wild world of crypto, where big-return claims can hide serious lies. As the lawsuit moves forward, the SEC is determined to hold Unicoin and its bosses responsible for what it calls a planned effort to fool investors.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

Authorities warn public to verify financial transactions as pensioner duped by fake online investment

Failed to withdraw funds from the BDSWISS trading account despite multiple attempts? Did the broker reject your fund withdrawal application without any reason? Did the high slippage lead to massive capital losses? Was the customer support team far from ideal? Many traders have reported these issues online. In this BDSWISS review article, we have examined several such complaints against the forex broker.

When your capital is at risk, trust isn't just a feeling - it's something you can measure. For traders thinking about using the broker Evest, one question is impossible to avoid: Is Evest a trusted partner for your investments, or does it put your investments at serious risk? The answer to this important question, "Is Evest Safe or Scam?", isn't found in the company's ads. You find it by comparing what the broker officially says with the real, often worrying experiences of actual users. This review won't rely on guessing. Instead, we'll take a deep look at the broker's legal status and, more importantly, the number and types of real Evest complaints. Our research is based on public information, mainly from the worldwide broker research platform, WikiFX, to show the truth about Evest's reputation.

XPO Markets, a Comoros-based brokerage entity, is in the news for negative reasons. These include the alleged INR 3,100 crore fund scam complaint filed by 3 lakh Indians in November 2025. Such a scam puts a serious question mark on the authenticity of this forex broker. In this XPO Markets review article, we have highlighted the million-dollar scam along with the risk parameters associated with this broker.