简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
The Biggest Hacking History in Cryptocurrency Shocks Bybit
Abstract:Know the biggest hacking history in cryptocurrency as Bybit loses $1.5B to Lazarus Group. Learn about the largest crypto heist, security breaches, and more.

In a startling blow to the cryptocurrency industry, Bybit, a prominent crypto exchange, suffered what analysts describe as the largest hacking incident in cryptocurrency history. On February 21, 2025, hackers stole $1.5 billion in digital assets, the greatest cryptocurrency robbery ever recorded. The assault targeted Bybit's cold wallet technology, which is generally an impenetrable fortress of offline storage, exposing flaws even in the most secure sections of the cryptocurrency sector.
The stolen assets, mostly ether (ETH), were quickly routed via a sophisticated network of wallets and sold across several platforms. Blockchain sleuths from companies such as Elliptic and Arkham Intelligence scrambled to trace down the stolen funds, observing as the hackers followed a sophisticated plan to hide their footprints. “This dwarfs every cryptocurrency theft we've seen before,” an Elliptic official said, citing previous events such as the $611 million Poly Network attack in 2021 and the $570 million Binance BNB token theft in 2022. The sheer scope of this breach has confirmed its status as the largest hacking incident in Bitcoin history.

Ben Zhou, Bybit's CEO, went to X to reassure users, saying, “Please rest assured that all other cold wallets are secure.” He highlighted that withdrawal operations were unaffected, saying, “All withdrawals are NORMAL.” The discovery, however, that the assault was carried out by North Korea's infamous Lazarus Group—a state-backed cyber syndicate—shocked the community. The organization, known for supporting Pyongyang's leadership through cybercrime, has a terrible track record, including a $200 million bitcoin heist from South Korean markets in 2017.
Tom Robinson, Elliptic's principal scientist, verified the Lazarus link, saying, “We've labeled the thief's addresses in our software, to help prevent these funds from being cashed out through any other exchanges.” The hackers used sophisticated tactics: they exploited a weakness in Bybit's cold wallet security, altering signature messages to hijack the smart contract logic that governs Ethereum storage. Once in possession, they drained the wallets and began a laundering spree, trading tokens and bridging assets to Bitcoin via platforms like Chainflip.
The fallout was swift. Panicked Bybit consumers launched a withdrawal frenzy, believing that the exchange would collapse under the weight of their losses. Zhou promptly addressed these worries, stating that outflows had steadied and revealed a bridging loan from unknown partners to support operations. Still, the episode has rekindled arguments about the long-term hazards of large-scale crypto thefts, casting a pall over the industry's expansion.
ZachXBT, an on-chain analyst, initially raised the alarm after noticing strange outflows of ETH and STETH from Bybits reserves. His findings, which were confirmed by Arkham Intelligence, tracked the monies to a Safe wallet (address: 0xa4b2fd68593b6f34e51cb9edb66e71c1b4ab449e) before spreading over several accounts. Centralized exchanges and protocols hurried to ban the identified addresses in an effort to stymie the hackers' cash-out attempts. However, ZachXBT later warned via Telegram that the Lazarus Group was already laundering the proceeds through obscure platforms such as eXch, demonstrating their proficiency in avoiding discovery.


For Bybit, the breach was a cold wallet disaster. Zhou noted that, while hot wallets were unaffected, the attackers' manipulation of ETH wallet contracts enabled them to acquire control of the offline funds. “The explanation for this incident lies in the manipulation of signature messages,” he stated, emphasizing that other wallet kinds were not affected. Bybit has subsequently resumed regular withdrawal services, which Zhou cited as evidence of the exchange's resiliency.
The most serious hacking incident in cryptocurrency history is more than simply a Bybit issue; it is a wake-up call for the industry. Experts such as Robinson suggest that preventing these crimes requires making stolen cash more difficult to commercialize. “The more difficult we make it to benefit from crimes such as this, the less frequently they will take place,” he predicted. As law enforcement and blockchain trackers look for the stolen $1.5 billion, the Lazarus Group's newest triumph serves as a harsh reminder of crypto's Achilles' heel: even the most robust protections may fail.
This enormous robbery has left Bybit scrambling to rebuild confidence while strengthening security. For the larger crypto community, this is a critical time to reconsider measures against state-sponsored attacks like Lazarus. As the dust settles, one thing is certain: the largest hacking incident in Bitcoin history has established a new standard for both cybercriminal daring and the stakes of digital asset safety.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Fidelity Exposed: Traders Complain About Withdrawal Denials, Frozen Accounts & Platform Glitches
Does Fidelity Investments prevent you from accessing funds despite numerous assurances on your requests? Do you witness an account freeze by the US-based forex broker every time you request withdrawal access? Do you struggle with an unstable trading platform here? Is the slow Fidelity customer service making you face forced liquidation? These issues haunt traders, with many of them voicing their frustration on several broker review platforms such as WikiFX. In this Fidelity review article, we have shared quite a few complaints for you to look at. Read on!

Exposing The Trading Pit: Traders Blame the Broker for Unfair Withdrawal Denials & Account Blocks
Did you receive contradictory emails from The Trading Pit, with one approving payout and another rejecting it, citing trading rule violations? Did you purchase multiple trading accounts but receive a payout on only one of them? Did The Trading Pit prop firm refund you for the remaining accounts without clear reasoning? Did you face account bans despite using limited margins and keeping investment risks to a minimum? These are some raging complaints found under The Trading Pit review. We will share some of these complaints in this article. Take a look.

M&G Review: Traders Report Fund Scams, Misleading Market Info & False Return Promises
Applying for multiple withdrawals at M&G Investments but not getting it into your bank account? Do you see the uncredited withdrawal funds out of your forex trading account on the M&G login? Does the customer support service fail to address this trading issue? Does the misleading market information provided on this forex broker’s trading platform make you lose all your invested capital? Were you lured into investing under the promise of guaranteed forex returns? These issues have become highly common for traders at M&G Investments. In this M&G review article, we have echoed investor sentiments through their complaint screenshots. Take a look!

Trading Pro Review: Scam Broker Exposed
Trading Pro Review reveals scam alerts, fake offices, and withdrawal issues. Stay cautious with this unregulated broker.
