Doctor loses RM880,000 in fake share investment scam
A doctor in Pahang lost over RM880,000 in a fake share scheme promising high returns
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:BitMEX fined $100M for anti-money laundering and KYC violations. The case highlights the U.S. crackdown on crypto platforms ignoring Bank Secrecy Act rules.

Cryptocurrency exchange BitMEX has been hit with a $100 million fine by U.S. authorities for failing to comply with anti-money-laundering (AML) and know-your-customer (KYC) rules. The ruling, issued by a Manhattan federal court, also sentenced the exchange to two years of probation after it pleaded guilty to violating the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA).
While the fine is significant, its a far cry from the $417 million prosecutors originally pursued. The case spotlighted how BitMEX operated with a disregard for U.S. laws designed to prevent financial crimes, including money laundering.
Prosecutors uncovered that BitMEX knowingly allowed U.S.-based customers to use its platform, despite regulations prohibiting this. Even after claiming to withdraw from the U.S. market in 2015, the Seychelles-based company implemented only weak measures to block American users. At the same time, its executives continued to promote the exchange at U.S. events.
Adding to the violations, BitMEX allegedly used a Hong Kong-based business as a pass-through for U.S. dollar transactions. Prosecutors said the company misled a Hong Kong bank about the nature of these activities.
“Todays sentence sends a clear message that companies that willfully violate these rules and refuse to implement AML/KYC programs will face consequences,” U.S. Attorney Matthew Podolsky said.

BitMEX addressed the ruling in a blog post, calling the charges “old news” and expressing disappointment about the penalty. However, the exchange acknowledged that the fine was far lower than the Justice Departments original demands.
The company also emphasized that it has been working to improve its AML and KYC protocols, even before the charges were brought against it. This effort is part of BitMEXs strategy to rebuild trust and ensure compliance with global regulations.
This isnt the first time BitMEX has faced consequences for its regulatory missteps. In 2021, the company agreed to pay $100 million to settle with U.S. regulators. In 2022, its three founders pleaded guilty to related criminal charges, each agreeing to pay $10 million in fines.
The BitMEX case highlights the growing pressure on cryptocurrency platforms to comply with financial regulations. With digital assets becoming more mainstream, governments worldwide are stepping up their efforts to ensure that exchanges have proper systems in place to prevent money laundering and other financial crimes.
The $100 million penalty is a wake-up call for the cryptocurrency industry. Its a clear reminder that compliance with AML and KYC regulations is not optional. For companies like BitMEX, failing to meet these standards risks not only hefty fines but also reputational damage. Moving forward, cryptocurrency exchanges must recognize that building trust with regulators and users alike is essential for long-term success in this evolving market.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

A doctor in Pahang lost over RM880,000 in a fake share scheme promising high returns

A Kuching man lost RM728,800 after being lured by a fake share investment advertised on social media, later discovering the scheme was non-existent when he was unable to withdraw the promised returns.

FIBO Group has grabbed attention from traders for mostly the wrong reasons, as traders have accused the broker of causing financial losses using malicious tactics. Whether it is about withdrawal access, deposit disappearance, trade manipulation, or awful customer support service, the broker is receiving flak from traders on all aspects online. Our team accumulated a list of complaints against the FIBO Group broker. Let’s screen these with us in this FIBO Group review article.

Do you have to pay taxes or margin when seeking fund withdrawals from GMO-Z.com, a Thailand-based forex broker? Do you witness heavy slippage when trading on the broker’s platform? These are some complaints traders have made against the broker. In this GMO-Z.com review article, we have explained these complaints. Take a look!