简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Trump vs. Harris: Whose policies are Better for US stock investors?
Abstract: The 2024 U.S. presidential election is garnering significant global attention. The policies of candidates Trump and Harris differ substantially, potentially leading to varied impacts on the U.S. stock market. This article analyzes the risks and opportunities their policies may bring to various industries and asset classes.

The 2024 U.S. presidential election is garnering significant global attention. The policies of candidates Trump and Harris differ substantially, potentially leading to varied impacts on the U.S. stock market. This article analyzes the risks and opportunities their policies may bring to various industries and asset classes.
If Trump Wins: Focus on Traditional Industries and Trade Liberalization Trumps policies are aimed at promoting economic growth through deregulation and tax cuts, with an emphasis on energy and market expansion.
- Cryptocurrency Support: Relaxing regulations on digital currencies to promote a freer trading environment. (Note: According to a 2022 survey by the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, about 10% of Americans hold crypto assets.)
- Tax and Regulation Cuts: Maintaining low tax rates to encourage corporate investment.
- Fossil Energy Promotion: Boosting fossil fuel development while cutting subsidies for new energy sources.
- Infrastructure Enhancement Plan: Investing actively in sectors like transportation, communication, and materials.
Industry Impact
- Positive: Financial, healthcare, fossil energy, transportation, construction, communications, materials.
- Negative: Clean energy, consumer goods.
If Trump wins, lowered corporate taxes and deregulation could lead to gains in the U.S. stock market and major indexes.
If Harris Wins: Balancing Social Welfare and Environmental Protection Harris prioritizes social welfare and environmental protection, aiming to boost green economic growth and social equity. Her policies could stimulate the new energy sector and consumer market.
- Export Promotion: Supporting multinational companies to expand and enhance competitiveness.
- Housing Support Expansion: Increasing housing supply through government grants and projects.
- Welfare Policy Strengthening: Raising purchasing power among low-income groups to drive consumption.
- Clean Energy Support: Investing heavily in new energy industries and reducing fossil fuel usage.
- Cannabis Legalization: Promoting the lawful development of the cannabis industry to stimulate related economic activities.
Industry Impact
- Positive: Multinational corporations, housing construction suppliers, clean energy, cannabis industry.
- Negative: Fossil energy.
Harris‘s policies, which include support for electric vehicles (EVs), could drive copper demand and increase its prices. However, her tax increases might negatively affect profitability in the tech and retail sectors compared to Trump’s policies. Additionally, regulatory pressure on AI security and antitrust measures may present risks for tech companies.
Assets Likely to Perform Well Regardless of Election Outcome: Gold With rising election uncertainty, gold is drawing attention as a safe asset. Investors may prioritize gold to hedge against market volatility.
Summary
- Trumps policies aim to reduce business costs and support traditional industries but may have negative effects on the green economy.
- Harriss policies promote sustainable development and social welfare, with expected growth in new energy and consumer markets. Investors should consider reallocating assets based on election outcomes and policy directions to adapt to market volatility and seize new opportunities.
Disclaimer This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Make investment decisions at your own risk.
Join WikiFX to track the dollar and gold markets and stay informed on the 2024 U.S. presidential election. Check out the latest articles from WikiFX editorial teams around the world!
WikiFX is an independent organization that evaluates the safety and reliability of FX brokers worldwide, providing information on broker profiles, regulatory searches, financial licenses, and broker safety. With WikiFX, you can assess the safety and credibility of over 50,000 FX brokers globally.
→ Search for any FX company on WikiFX now!
[Note] There has been a recent surge in fraud cases involving invitations to FX investments through people met on social media or matching apps and invited to LINE groups. If approached, verify the recommended FX broker on WikiFX. Note: FX brokers established within the last 1–2 years may lack sufficient data or user information. High ratings may still pose withdrawal risks, so exercise caution when investing.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Voices of the Golden Insight Award Jury | David Bily, Founder and CEO of Moneta Markets
WikiFX Golden Insight Award uniting industry forces to build a safe and healthy forex ecosystem, driving industry innovation and sustainable development, launches a new feature series — “Voices of the Golden Insight Awards Jury.” Through in-depth conversations with distinguished judges, this series explores the evolving landscape of the forex industry and the shared mission to promote innovation, ethics, and sustainability.

ASIC Launches Preliminary Investigation into Clime Australian Income Fund
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has launched a preliminary investigation into the Clime Australian Income Fund, examining whether the Fund’s Target Market Determination (TMD) and Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) comply with Australian financial regulations. The investigation will also assess whether any breaches of the law have occurred in relation to the Fund’s investment activities.

HSBC announced a $1.1 billion charge linked to the largest Ponzi scheme in financial history
The British banking giant HSBC Holdings Plc has announced a potential $1.1 billion charge connected to the long-running Bernard Madoff Ponzi scheme, following a legal ruling in Luxembourg. The claim stems from Herald Fund, a European investment fund that sued HSBC over alleged losses related to the Madoff fraud.

BofA Securities pays more than $150K fine to settle its charge
BofA Securities, Inc. (BofAS) has agreed to pay a $155,000 fine and accept a censure from the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) after FINRA found multiple violations of market trading and supervisory rules.
