简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
CFTC Fines Nasdaq Futures $22M for Providing Misleading Info
Abstract:CFTC fines Nasdaq Futures $22M for providing misleading info and violating Core Principles. This penalty underscores the importance of transparency in financial markets.

Washington, DC - The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) fined Nasdaq Futures, Inc. $22 million, a former designated contract market (DCM). The penalty is the result of the company's failure to disclose important data about its incentive programs to both the CFTC and the public, as well as submitting incorrect and misleading information to the regulatory body. This fine emphasizes the CFTC's strict regulation of market activities as well as the value of openness in the financial sector.
Violation of Core Principles
The CFTC's inquiry showed that Nasdaq Futures, Inc. failed to create, monitor, or enforce regulations governing an incentive program given to select traders on its platform. The Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) requires DCMs, such as Nasdaq Futures, to follow specified Core Principles aimed at maintaining market integrity and safeguarding participants. Among these principles is the duty to provide the CFTC, market participants, and the general public with accurate and full information.
Nasdaq Futures, Inc. failed in this respect by failing to disclose all aspects of its incentive scheme. In particular, the business did not notify the CFTC about a volume-based component of its “Designated Market Maker” (DMM) program. This component provides extra payouts to specific participants depending on the overall amount of contracts exchanged, a critical fact that was concealed in CFTC communications.
False and Misleading Statements
Nasdaq Futures, Inc., was a DCM that specialized in energy commodity futures contracts between July 2015 and July 2018. During this time, the business launched a number of incentive schemes, including the DMM program, which paid a set monthly stipend to market makers to boost market liquidity. However, the CFTC was purposely kept unaware of the existence of a volume-based incentive inside this scheme.

According to the CFTC's ruling, Nasdaq Futures, Inc. provided incorrect and misleading information concerning the DMM program. When questioned by CFTC officials, workers consistently denied the existence of volume-based incentives despite the fact that such payments were given to some program participants. These practices violated the CEA and undercut the CFTC's expectation of trust and openness from regulated firms.
Regulatory Oversight and Compliance Failures
The CFTC's ruling also cited Nasdaq Futures, Inc.'s failure to follow regulatory service provider guidelines. The corporation was instructed to contact three DMM program members about a particular trading activity, but it did not do so and did not record the reasons for its decision. This lapse added to the breaches of other DCM Core Principles.
CFTC Director of Enforcement Ian McGinley underscored the gravity of the infractions, adding, “The CFTC's oversight regime is dependent on CFTC-designated exchanges providing accurate information to the CFTC and market participants.” Nasdaq Futures, Inc.'s actions here constitute severe breaches of both its responsibility to furnish such information and multiple statutory Core Principles applicable to CFTC-designated exchanges.
Consequences and Industry Impact
The $22 million civil monetary penalty issued on Nasdaq Futures, Inc. exemplifies the repercussions of failing to comply with regulatory standards. The CFTC's action emphasizes the significance of openness and correct reporting in ensuring market stability.
This case is keenly watched by the financial sector, as it demonstrates the CFTC's commitment to holding corporations accountable for their activities. The penalties also send a strong message to all market players about the necessity of complying with regulatory requirements and the consequences of non-compliance.
The CFTC expressed gratitude to the National Futures Association for their help in this instance. Brett Shanks, Elsie Robinson, Jeff Le Riche, Brandon Wozniak, Margaret Aisenbrey, Jordon Grimm, Christopher Reed, Charles Marvine, and former Division of Enforcement employee Jo Mettenburg were all engaged in this case.
Conclusion
Nasdaq Futures, Inc. received a $22 million penalty for failing to disclose critical information and making deceptive representations to the CFTC. This case emphasizes the crucial necessity of regulatory compliance and openness in financial markets and confirms the CFTC's responsibility to ensure market stability.
Stay updated on this and other financial news by visiting our WikiFX news page for the latest updates and in-depth coverage.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

WikiEXPO Dubai 2025 Concludes Successfully — Shaping a Transparent, Innovative Future
On November 11, WikiEXPO Dubai 2025, hosted by WikiGlobal and co-organized by WikiFX, successfully concluded. As one of the world’s most influential Fintech expos, this event brought together more than 570 regulatory representatives, industry leaders, and innovation pioneers from across the globe. Through in-depth discussions on core issues such as regulatory compliance, the forex market, investment strategies, and sustainable finance, the event delivered a profound experience that masterfully blended intellectual depth with actionable insights.

The 5%ers Review: Is it a Scam or Legit? Find Out from These Trader Comments
Did you face reduced leverage and hiked fees without any explanation from The 5%ers broker? Do you find The 5%er rules strange for getting a funded account from this prop trading firm? Has the broker closed your trade inappropriately, preventing you from making gains in the forex market? All these allegations have dominated The 5%ers review segment online. Looking at this, the WikiFX team investigated and found some startling comments against the broker. In this article, we have shared those complaints. Read on!

BROKSTOCK Exposed: Traders Report Login Errors, Withdrawal Issues & Incompetent Customer Support
Is your BROKSTOCK trading account full of inefficiencies? Do the recurrent BROKSTOCK login errors prevent you from opening and shorting positions at a favorable price? Has the broker failed to honor your withdrawal requests? Do you face order execution price issues? Has the customer support service failed to resolve your queries? You are not alone! In this BROKSTOCK review article, we have shared some complaints that need a close introspection. Read on to explore them.

OmegaPro Review: Traders Flood Comment Sections with Withdrawal Denials & Scam Complaints
Has your deposit and withdrawal scenario worsened after the initial good experience at OmegaPro, a UK-based forex broker? Does the broker ask you to invest when withdrawing your funds? Did the broker officials trap you with their false promises of compound interest on your deposit? Have you found it impossible to transfer funds from your OmegaPro login to another broker’s account? Do you witness a lack of support when dealing with these unfortunate trading circumstances? These are no longer isolated complaints — they have allegedly become the reason for OmegaPro’s tarnished trust and reputation within the trading community. Read on as we share the OmegaPro review in this article.
