简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
CFTC Fines JPMorgan $100M for Reporting Violations
Abstract:JPMorgan admits to breaking CFTC rules, paying a $100 million fine for trade reporting lapses dating back to 2013.

On Thursday, the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) said that JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM.N.) had admitted to breaking its laws surrounding trade reporting failures and had agreed to pay $100 million as a fine.
JPMorgan discovered significant gaps in its order and trade data monitoring, some dating back to 2013, which led to the revelation of the infractions in June 2021. The regulator concluded that these disparities led to the bank's failure to comply with the CFTC-required trade data reporting standards.
A JPMorgan representative would not respond specifically, but they did refer to previous remarks in which the bank admitted to itself that it had reported the infractions. The bank found no wrongdoing and emphasized that consumers had not suffered any damage.
The CFTC has accomplished much with this settlement, which involves an acknowledgment of misconduct. Companies accused of misbehavior are discovering that the regulatory body is becoming more and more keen on confessions of guilt in settlements. This initiative aims to increase openness and accountability in the financial industry.
In both civil and criminal cases, financial corporations usually avoid making such confessions because of the extra expenses that may come from private litigation. However, the CFTC's enforcement head and the Democratic CFTC commissioners have been quite clear that these confessions are necessary to hold companies accountable.

Commissioner Kristin Johnson lamented the frequent conclusion of enforcement proceedings without addressing the underlying errors, wrongdoings, or compliance breaches in her remarks delivered on Thursday at the JPMorgan settlement. In her remarks, she emphasized how these kinds of confessions help cultivate a compliance and responsibility culture in the banking sector.
This example illustrates the challenges regulators face in guaranteeing the implementation of compliance regulations by large financial institutions. JPMorgan's blunders went undetected for years due to the difficulties of monitoring and ensuring that everyone is following the regulations when it comes to transaction reporting. The severe penalty and admission of guilt aim to convey to other businesses the importance of strict compliance and discourage them from engaging in similar activities.
The CFTC's emphasis on eliciting confessions of guilt, even when financial firms resist, reflects a change in regulatory enforcement techniques. The agency's goal in obtaining these confessions is to encourage honesty and openness in the financial markets, as well as discourage such infractions in the future.
This case's verdict could establish a standard for the treatment of trade reporting infractions and affect subsequent regulatory actions and settlements. Due to the elevated risk of public confessions of misconduct and heavy fines, financial institutions may have to reevaluate their strategy toward enforcement and compliance activities.
The CFTC's actions in the JPMorgan case underscore the continuous need for responsibility and attention as the financial industry continues to maneuver through the intricacies of regulatory compliance. The settlement not only corrects the identified infractions but also clarifies the consequences of non-compliance with regulations.
Last but not least, JPMorgan's $100 million fine and admission of breaking CFTC transaction reporting regulations demonstrate the CFTC's commitment to regulating compliance and enhancing accountability in the financial sector. The case highlights the need for strong compliance systems and the consequences that might arise from failing to conform to regulations.
You may access all related news here.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Grand Capital Doesn’t Feel GRAND for Traders with Withdrawal Denials & Long Processing Times
The trading environment does not seem that rosy for traders at Grand Capital, a Seychelles-based forex broker. Traders’ requests for withdrawals are alleged to be in the review process for months, making them frustrated and helpless. Despite meeting the guidelines, traders find it hard to withdraw funds, as suggested by their complaints online. What’s also troubling traders are long processing times concerning Grand Capital withdrawals. In this Grand Capital review segment, we have shared some complaints for you to look at. Read on!

EmiraX Markets Withdrawal Issues Exposed
EmiraX Markets Review reveals unregulated status, fake license claims, and withdrawal issues. Stay safe and avoid this broker.

ADSS Review: Traders Say NO to Trading B’coz of Withdrawal Blocks, Account Freeze & Trade Issues
Does ADSS give you plenty of excuses to deny you access to withdrawals? Is your withdrawal request pending for months or years? Do you witness account freezes from the United Arab Emirates-based forex broker? Do you struggle to open and close your forex positions on the ADSS app? Does the customer support service fail to respond to your trading queries? All these issues have become a rage online. In this ADSS Broker review article, we have highlighted actual trader wordings on these issues. Keep reading!

INGOT Brokers Regulation 2025: ASIC vs Offshore License - What Traders Must Know
Explore INGOT Brokers regulation in 2025: Compare their ASIC and Seychelles FSA licenses, understand trader protection levels, and learn about potential risks in this detailed guide.
