简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
SEC Targets 4 Long Island Traders in $2 Million Fraud Scandal
Abstract:The Securities and Exchange Commission sets its sights on a group of Long Island traders, accusing them of orchestrating a multi-million-dollar fraud scheme, unravelling a web of deception in the world of securities trading.

In a recent development, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has levied allegations against Eduardo Hernandez, Christopher Flagg, Daquan Lloyd, and Corey Ortiz, individuals associated with Long Island, New York, accusing them of orchestrating a lucrative “free-riding” scheme over several years, amassing illicit gains surpassing $2 million.
The SEC contends that spanning approximately November 2018 to January 2022, the accused parties were engaged in what's known as a free-riding scheme. This dubious practice involves trading securities without possessing adequate funds to cover the transactions, a clear breach of regulatory standards.
According to the SEC's complaint, the defendants established unfunded brokerage accounts, often dubbed “loser accounts,” as part of their alleged scheme. These accounts served as vehicles for generating trading profits through matched trading with winner brokerage accounts under their purview.
Moreover, the complaint alleges that the defendants maintained these loser accounts at a brokerage firm offering instant deposit credit. Exploiting this credit, they purportedly financed trades within loser accounts through manipulated prices with winner accounts, often using thinly-traded options to execute their manoeuvres.

The crux of the alleged wrongdoing lies in the defendants' purported transfer of credit provided by the broker from loser accounts to winner accounts. This manoeuvre, as claimed, enabled them to accumulate guaranteed profits at the brokerage's expense. It's estimated that over the relevant period, the defendants utilized at least 600 brokerage accounts to repeatedly execute their purportedly fraudulent scheme.
In response to these allegations, the SEC has taken legal action. The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, brings charges against Hernandez and Flagg for violating antifraud provisions under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rules 10b-5(a) and (c) thereunder. Additionally, they are accused of further violations by allegedly acting through or with the assistance of another individual, a contravention of Exchange Act Section 20(b). Ortiz and Lloyd are implicated for aiding and abetting Hernandez's and Flagg's purported violations.
The SEC's legal pursuit aims to secure various forms of relief, including permanent injunctive relief, conduct-based injunctions, disgorgement coupled with prejudgment interest, and imposition of civil penalties.
This unfolding narrative underscores the intricate interplay between regulatory oversight and financial malfeasance, shedding light on the challenges posed by illicit schemes in the realm of securities trading. As legal proceedings unfold, the ramifications of these allegations will undoubtedly reverberate across the financial landscape.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Consob Targets Political Deepfake “Clone Sites” and Unlicensed Platforms in Latest Enforcement Round
New Consob blackouts expose cloned investment sites and illegal forex platforms; investors are urged to verify licences and domains before funding any account.

Fidelity Exposed: Traders Complain About Withdrawal Denials, Frozen Accounts & Platform Glitches
Does Fidelity Investments prevent you from accessing funds despite numerous assurances on your requests? Do you witness an account freeze by the US-based forex broker every time you request withdrawal access? Do you struggle with an unstable trading platform here? Is the slow Fidelity customer service making you face forced liquidation? These issues haunt traders, with many of them voicing their frustration on several broker review platforms such as WikiFX. In this Fidelity review article, we have shared quite a few complaints for you to look at. Read on!

Exposing The Trading Pit: Traders Blame the Broker for Unfair Withdrawal Denials & Account Blocks
Did you receive contradictory emails from The Trading Pit, with one approving payout and another rejecting it, citing trading rule violations? Did you purchase multiple trading accounts but receive a payout on only one of them? Did The Trading Pit prop firm refund you for the remaining accounts without clear reasoning? Did you face account bans despite using limited margins and keeping investment risks to a minimum? These are some raging complaints found under The Trading Pit review. We will share some of these complaints in this article. Take a look.

M&G Review: Traders Report Fund Scams, Misleading Market Info & False Return Promises
Applying for multiple withdrawals at M&G Investments but not getting it into your bank account? Do you see the uncredited withdrawal funds out of your forex trading account on the M&G login? Does the customer support service fail to address this trading issue? Does the misleading market information provided on this forex broker’s trading platform make you lose all your invested capital? Were you lured into investing under the promise of guaranteed forex returns? These issues have become highly common for traders at M&G Investments. In this M&G review article, we have echoed investor sentiments through their complaint screenshots. Take a look!
