简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Banking Giant Morgan Stanley to Pay SEC $249M for Settlement
Abstract:This article unravels the Securities and Exchange Commission's charges against Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC and its former equity syndicate desk head, Pawan Passi, exposing a multi-year fraud involving the unauthorized disclosure of confidential information in the realm of block trades.

Last week, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) brought charges against Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, a prominent investment banking giant, and Pawan Passi, the former head of its equity syndicate desk. The charges pertain to a lengthy period of fraud involving the disclosure of confidential information related to the sale of substantial quantities of stock, commonly referred to as “block trades.” Additionally, the SEC accused Morgan Stanley of neglecting to enforce its policies addressing the misuse of material non-public information linked to block trades.
Block trades typically involve the private arrangement and execution of a substantial number of shares of a company's stock outside the public markets.
According to the SEC's findings, spanning from June 2018 to August 2021, Passi and a subordinate on Morgan Stanley's equity syndicate desk revealed non-public, potentially market-moving information about imminent block trades to select buy-side investors. This disclosure occurred despite confidentiality requests from the sellers and Morgan Stanley's own policies concerning confidential information handling.

The SEC's orders assert that Morgan Stanley and Passi shared the block trade information with the expectation that the buy-side investors would utilize it to “pre-position” themselves by taking significant short positions in the stock slated for the impending block trade.
As per the SEC orders, in the event that Morgan Stanley proceeded to purchase the block trade, the buy-side investors would then seek and receive allocations from Morgan Stanley to cover their short positions. This pre-positioning strategy effectively mitigated Morgan Stanley's risk in acquiring block trades.
The SEC's order also notes Morgan Stanley's failure to implement effective information barriers, preventing material non-public information about specific block trades from being transmitted by the equity syndicate desk, situated on the private side of Morgan Stanley, to a trading division on the public side. Consequently, the firm could not adequately scrutinize whether trades by that division, made while the equity syndicate desk was in talks with selling shareholders regarding potential block trades, were based on confidential discussions.
The SEC's order against Morgan Stanley determines that the firm willfully violated Sections 10(b) and 15(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5(b) thereunder. As a result, the firm is censured and required to pay around $138 million in disgorgement, approximately $28 million in prejudgment interest, and an $83 million civil penalty.
Concerning Pawan Passi, the SEC's order finds him willfully violating Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. He is mandated to pay a $250,000 civil penalty and faces associational, penny stock, and supervisory bars.
In a simultaneous development, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York announced criminal resolutions with both Morgan Stanley and Passi. The SEC's ordered disgorgement and prejudgment interest for Morgan Stanley will be considered partially satisfied by the firm's forfeiture and restitution, totaling $136,531,223, as part of its criminal resolution.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

WikiFX Elite Club Committee Makes Its Debut, Charting the Future of the Global Trading Ecosystem
November 11, 2025 – The WikiFX Elite Club Committee (hereafter “the Elite Committee”) made its significant debut on the international stage at WikiEXPO Dubai 2025. Core members from the Middle East, Southeast Asia, and Chinese-speaking regions gathered to witness the beginning of a new chapter for the Elite Club.

WikiEXPO Dubai 2025 Concludes Successfully — Shaping a Transparent, Innovative Future
On November 11, WikiEXPO Dubai 2025, hosted by WikiGlobal and co-organized by WikiFX, successfully concluded. As one of the world’s most influential Fintech expos, this event brought together more than 570 regulatory representatives, industry leaders, and innovation pioneers from across the globe. Through in-depth discussions on core issues such as regulatory compliance, the forex market, investment strategies, and sustainable finance, the event delivered a profound experience that masterfully blended intellectual depth with actionable insights.

The 5%ers Review: Is it a Scam or Legit? Find Out from These Trader Comments
Did you face reduced leverage and hiked fees without any explanation from The 5%ers broker? Do you find The 5%er rules strange for getting a funded account from this prop trading firm? Has the broker closed your trade inappropriately, preventing you from making gains in the forex market? All these allegations have dominated The 5%ers review segment online. Looking at this, the WikiFX team investigated and found some startling comments against the broker. In this article, we have shared those complaints. Read on!

BROKSTOCK Exposed: Traders Report Login Errors, Withdrawal Issues & Incompetent Customer Support
Is your BROKSTOCK trading account full of inefficiencies? Do the recurrent BROKSTOCK login errors prevent you from opening and shorting positions at a favorable price? Has the broker failed to honor your withdrawal requests? Do you face order execution price issues? Has the customer support service failed to resolve your queries? You are not alone! In this BROKSTOCK review article, we have shared some complaints that need a close introspection. Read on to explore them.
