简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Swiss FINMA Demands More Authority After Credit Suisse Takeover
Abstract:FINMA calls for enhanced regulatory powers after Credit Suisse crisis. Strengthening Swiss banking oversight for stability and accountability.

ZURICH, Switzerland – In a decisive response to the Credit Suisse crisis, the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA) has called for expanded regulatory powers. This request follows the high-profile takeover of Credit Suisse, a venerable institution in Swiss banking, by UBS in March, orchestrated under the watchful eye of Swiss authorities amidst a severe client and investor exodus.
The authority's recent report underscores its successful collaboration with the Swiss government and the Swiss National Bank in preserving the solvency of Credit Suisse and securing financial stability. Yet, the regulator emphasizes the urgent need for enhanced legal capabilities to better manage and preempt future banking crises.
FINMA's proposals for increased powers are multifaceted. They include the implementation of a Senior Managers Regime, the authority to impose significant fines, and more stringent rules regarding corporate governance. These measures aim to fortify the regulatory framework and ensure greater accountability and oversight of the banking sector.
The context for FINMA's call to action is a story of errors and failures at Credit Suisse. Despite being 167 years old, the bank was on the verge of collapse owing to a series of risk management errors and scandals. These challenges were exacerbated by the inconsistency with which strategy changes designed to de-risk the bank, such as shrinking its investment wing and concentrating on asset management, were implemented.

Furthermore, the bank's reputation suffered due to recurrent scandals.
FINMA's intensive oversight of Credit Suisse in the years preceding the crisis is noteworthy. The regulator conducted 43 preliminary investigations, resulting in nine reprimands, 16 criminal charges, and 14 enforcement proceedings. These figures highlight the regulator's proactive stance but also point to the limitations of its current legal powers.
Another aspect of concern is the remuneration practices at Credit Suisse. Even during times of heavy financial losses, executive compensation remained high, with shareholders showing limited initiative in influencing pay structures. This situation raises critical questions about the efficacy of governance and incentive systems within major financial institutions.
In the wake of the Credit Suisse collapse, FINMA's report also delves into the bank's risk culture and its corporate governance. The regulator had previously imposed various measures, including capital and liquidity requirements, interventions in governance and remuneration, and restrictions on business activities. However, the crisis has revealed that these measures were not enough to prevent the bank's downfall.

The regulator's proposed legal enhancements are aimed at providing it with a broader range of tools to influence the governance of supervised entities more effectively. These include not only the ability to levy fines but also the option of publicly disclosing enforcement proceedings. To effectively intervene in remuneration systems, FINMA asserts that a more robust legal mandate is essential.
This development marks a significant moment for the Swiss banking sector, historically known for its stability and robustness. The collapse of Credit Suisse has implications beyond Switzerland, reflecting the interconnected nature of global finance. It highlights the need for vigilant regulatory oversight and responsive governance structures in the banking industry.
As FINMA seeks to bolster its regulatory framework, the focus is on enhancing the resilience of the Swiss banking sector. The measures proposed aim to prevent similar crises, protect the interests of investors and clients, and maintain the integrity of the banking system.
The unfolding situation around Credit Suisse and FINMA's response will be closely watched by financial markets worldwide. It underscores the importance of robust regulatory frameworks in maintaining financial stability and the need for continual adaptation and strengthening of these systems.
FINMA's request for enhanced powers is an important step toward ensuring that Swiss banks, and hence the global financial community, function in a more safe and responsible environment. The changes implemented in reaction to the Credit Suisse crisis are expected to have far-reaching ramifications for global banking regulation and governance.
For further information, please see the entire report produced by FINMA or contact the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority directly.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Close Up With WikiFX —— Take A Close Look At Amillex
With the rapid growth of global multi-asset investment markets, the differences among regional forex markets have become increasingly significant. As a forex broker information service platform operating in more than 180 countries and regions, WikiFX is dedicated to helping investors in every market identify reliable brokers. Therefore, we have launched an exclusive interview series —— "Close Up With WikiFX", offering in-depth conversations with local brokers. This series aims to dive deep into frontline markets and provide first-hand information, helping investors gain a clearer and more comprehensive understanding of quality brokers.

Seacrest Markets Exposed: Are You Facing Payout Denials and Spread Issues with This Prop Firm?
Seacrest Markets has garnered wrath from traders owing to a variety of reasons, including payout denials for traders winning trading challenges, high slippage causing losses, the lack of response from the customer support official to address withdrawal issues, and more. Irritated by these trading inefficiencies, a lot of traders have given a negative review of Seacrest Markets prop firm. In this article, we have shared some of them. Take a look!

GKFX Review: Are Traders Facing Slippage and Account Freeze Issues?
Witnessing capital losses despite tall investment return assurances by GKFX officials? Do these officials sound too difficult for you to judge, whether they offer real or fake advice? Do you encounter slippage issues causing a profit reduction on the GKFX login? Is account freezing usual at GKFX? Does the United Kingdom-based forex broker prevent you from accessing withdrawals? You are not alone! In this GKFX review guide, we have shared the complaints. Take a look!

Is Seaprimecapitals Regulated? A Complete Look at Its Safety and How It Works
The straightforward answer to this important question is no. Seaprimecapitals works as a broker without proper regulation. This fact is the most important thing any trader needs to know, because it creates serious risks for your capital and how safely the company operates. While this broker offers some good features, like the popular MetaTrader 5 platform and a low starting deposit, these benefits cannot make up for the major risks that come from having no real financial supervision. This article will give you a detailed, fact-based look at Seaprimecapitals regulation, what the company claims to do, the services it provides, and the clear differences between official information and user reviews. Our purpose is to give you the information you need to make a smart decision about the risks and benefits of working with this company.
