简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Interactive Brokers Australia Faces Hefty $832,500 Penalty Over Suspicious Trading Concerns
Abstract:Interactive Brokers Australia faces a $832,500 penalty following concerns over suspicious trading activities. The Market Disciplinary Panel (MDP) highlighted the firm's negligence in identifying dubious trades, even after warnings from the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC).

Interactive Brokers Australia Pty Ltd, a major player in electronic trading, has shelled out a substantial penalty of $832,500, following an infringement notice issued by the Market Disciplinary Panel (MDP).
The crux of the issue lies in Interactive Brokers' oversight in spotting suspicious trading activities of a specific client. The MDP emphasized Interactive Brokers' negligence in not identifying these dubious trades, compounded by the company's reckless approach. Despite receiving warnings from the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), the firm continued to enable more questionable trades.
It's paramount for market participants to actively curb suspicious trading, armed with robust controls and the necessary resources. These entities should be adept at detecting potential market malpractices swiftly and must address any red flags raised by regulatory bodies like ASIC promptly.
Delving into specifics, ASIC's apprehensions stem from certain Closing Single Price Auction (CSPA) orders. These orders were lodged by an Interactive Brokers' client on the ASX from 10 March to 5 November 2021. This particular client, known for trading in Orthocell Ltd. (OCC) shares, wasn't a novice but an industry insider.
Interactive Brokers, given the clients trading patterns, should have been on high alert. Indicators of suspicion included:
- Late entry or modification in the CSPA.
- Trivial volume and value of orders.
- Manipulation to keep the OCC's price at the day's peak.
- Discrepancies in the clients trading throughout the pertinent day.

Moreover, the MDP highlighted that Interactive Brokers turned a blind eye when the client seemed to artificially boost the closing price of OCC. This activity painted a distorted image concerning OCC's price.
Adding fuel to the fire, ASIC alerted Interactive Brokers on 14 October 2021 about the irregularities. Yet, the client's suspicious trading didn't halt. Alarmingly, the client's activities prompted 44 ‘marking the close’ notifications on Interactive Brokers surveillance system between 10 February and 13 October 2021.
MDP criticized Interactive Brokers' lackadaisical response:
- Delays in addressing alerts.
- Insufficient documentation during alert assessments.
- Inaction regarding the client's trading behavior.
- Only reporting suspicious activities to ASIC on 5 November 2021.
It became evident that Interactive Brokers either lacked qualified personnel to handle such alerts or failed to provide appropriate supervision. The MDP underscored that high-risk alerts require immediate attention and comprehensive reviews within two weeks.
Interactive Brokers' inability to uphold the necessary 'organizational and technical resources' was not just an oversight but negligence, threatening the market's efficiency and integrity.
However, it's pivotal to note that settling the infringement doesn't equate to Interactive Brokers admitting any wrongdoing. The firm is not deemed to have breached any sections of the Corporations Act.
For continuous updates on this topic and more, it's recommended to check out the WikiFX App.
Download the WikiFX App here: https://www.wikifx.com/en/download.html.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

The 5%ers Review: Is it a Scam or Legit? Find Out from These Trader Comments
Did you face reduced leverage and hiked fees without any explanation from The 5%ers broker? Do you find The 5%er rules strange for getting a funded account from this prop trading firm? Has the broker closed your trade inappropriately, preventing you from making gains in the forex market? All these allegations have dominated The 5%ers review segment online. Looking at this, the WikiFX team investigated and found some startling comments against the broker. In this article, we have shared those complaints. Read on!

BROKSTOCK Exposed: Traders Report Login Errors, Withdrawal Issues & Incompetent Customer Support
Is your BROKSTOCK trading account full of inefficiencies? Do the recurrent BROKSTOCK login errors prevent you from opening and shorting positions at a favorable price? Has the broker failed to honor your withdrawal requests? Do you face order execution price issues? Has the customer support service failed to resolve your queries? You are not alone! In this BROKSTOCK review article, we have shared some complaints that need a close introspection. Read on to explore them.

OmegaPro Review: Traders Flood Comment Sections with Withdrawal Denials & Scam Complaints
Has your deposit and withdrawal scenario worsened after the initial good experience at OmegaPro, a UK-based forex broker? Does the broker ask you to invest when withdrawing your funds? Did the broker officials trap you with their false promises of compound interest on your deposit? Have you found it impossible to transfer funds from your OmegaPro login to another broker’s account? Do you witness a lack of support when dealing with these unfortunate trading circumstances? These are no longer isolated complaints — they have allegedly become the reason for OmegaPro’s tarnished trust and reputation within the trading community. Read on as we share the OmegaPro review in this article.

Inzo Broker Review 2025: A Complete Look at Features, Costs and User Claims
Inzo Broker presents itself as a modern forex and CFD broker, started in 2021 and registered in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. At first glance, it offers an attractive package for traders: access to the popular MetaTrader 5 (MT5) and cTrader platforms, different types of accounts for various budget levels, and a wide selection of assets to trade. These features are made to attract both new and experienced traders. However, a closer look shows a big difference between these advertised benefits and the real risks. The broker works under an offshore regulatory system, which gives limited protection to investors. More importantly, Inzo has collected many serious user complaints, especially about withdrawing funds and changing trading conditions unfairly. This mix of weak oversight and serious user claims creates a high-risk situation that potential clients must carefully think about. This review will break down these parts to give a clear, fact-based view.

