FCA-Regulated Forex Brokers Are Declining — 31 Platforms to Avoid
As of December 1, 2025, a total of 105 companies in the United Kingdom held CFD licences.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:Did UEZ Markets really get hacked or is this just an excuse for the company to withhold traders’ funds for an indefinite period of time?!

In the dynamic world of online trading, the choice of a broker can make or break a trader's experience.
Founded in 2020 within the confines of the Cayman Islands, UEZ Markets offers various financial instruments and services, including forex trading, CFD trading, stocks, and commodities. Despite its promise and allure, the broker's regulatory status has come into question, casting a shadow over its operations.

The official website of UEZ Markets, accessible at https://uezmarkets.com/, claims that the broker is regulated by two reputable authorities: Australia‘s ASIC and the United States’ NFA. However, a meticulous investigation by WikiFX has revealed a starkly different narrative. UEZ Markets has earned an abysmally low WikiFX score, further eroding confidence in its reputation and ethical standing.

WikiFX, renowned for its in-depth evaluation of brokers, is pivotal in guiding traders toward informed decisions. A broker's WikiFX score reflects compliance with industry standards, regulatory oversight, and overall client satisfaction. The dissonance between UEZ Markets' alleged regulatory affiliations and its subpar WikiFX score raises alarm bells, leaving traders questioning the legitimacy of the broker's claims.
Adding to the scepticism, a disgruntled user recently voiced his concerns regarding his experience with UEZ Markets. Having initially invested $2000 into his trading account, his anxieties deepened when he attempted to initiate a withdrawal and found himself unable to do so. The situation left him in a state of panic, questioning the reliability of the broker he had entrusted with his funds.

UEZ Markets provided an explanation that raises even more doubts. The broker claimed that its system had fallen victim to hacking, resulting in erroneous figures on its platform, including investment amounts and trades. The puzzling revelation that a substantial trade had been liquidated, as per MT5 records, only fueled suspicions. The lack of solid evidence to corroborate such a significant event and the absence of contingency measures like backup servers has left traders questioning the integrity of UEZ Markets' explanation.

In conclusion, UEZ Markets' unregulated status and low WikiFX score have overshadowed its credibility within the online trading community. The discrepancy between its claimed regulatory oversight and the reality of its WikiFX score underscores the importance of rigorous due diligence for traders. This victim's unfortunate experience serves as a stark reminder that choosing a broker demands careful consideration, and traders must remain vigilant to safeguard their investments in the tumultuous landscape of online trading.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

As of December 1, 2025, a total of 105 companies in the United Kingdom held CFD licences.

Has Dbinvesting failed to honor your fund withdrawal requests? Did you notice that the broker remained fine when you were losing and turned worse as your numbers gained on the Dbinvesting login? Did the broker wipe out your profits and block your trading account? Many such allegations from users across India, the US and other regions have become headlines on broker review platforms such as WikiFX. To make it comprehensive, we have prepared an in-depth investigation report into user allegations, the company’s products and services, and, importantly, regulatory status, in this Dbinvesting review article.

Times are tough for the rupee as it again slipped to 95 against the USD towards the end of April 2026 after some gains due to the RBI-led interventions early this month. The depreciation is largely attributable to surging crude oil prices. The prices climbed to their 3-year high over the US-Iran conflict. On April 30, 2026, the rupee opened at 95.02 mark against the USD, sliding 0.2% from its previous day’s ending at 94.84 against the greenback. As the day progressed, it slipped further to a new record low of 95.32 against the USD, beating the earlier fall of 95.22 in March 2026.

When you ask, "Is AssetsFX legit?", you're asking an important question about keeping your funds safe. After looking at all the available information, the answer is concerning: AssetsFX shows serious risks that traders should worry about. Our research found multiple problems that can't be overlooked. WikiFX, a website that checks brokers worldwide, gives AssetsFX only 2.44 points out of 10. They also warn users: "Low score, please stay away!" This very low rating isn't random. It comes from two main problems: the company doesn't have proper licenses from respected authorities, and many users have complained about losing funds. This article will explain the evidence behind this rating, giving you the facts you need to make a smart choice and protect your investments.