FCA-Regulated Forex Brokers Are Declining — 31 Platforms to Avoid
As of December 1, 2025, a total of 105 companies in the United Kingdom held CFD licences.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:Bastion Capital London Limited (in liquidation) has been fined £2,452,700 by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) due to serious financial crime control failures related to cum-ex trading. The company neglected to effectively manage the risk of being involved in fraudulent trading and money laundering activities.

Bastion Capital London Limited (in liquidation) has been fined £2,452,700 by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) due to serious financial crime control failures related to cum-ex trading. The company neglected to effectively manage the risk of being involved in fraudulent trading and money laundering activities.
During the period between January 2014 and September 2015, Bastion executed trades amounting to approximately £49 billion in Danish equities and £22.5 billion in Belgian equities on behalf of clients from the Solo Group. These trades were conducted in a manner that strongly indicated involvement in financial crime. It appears that the purpose of these trades was to facilitate withholding tax reclaims in Denmark and Belgium. Bastion received a commission of £1.55 million, a significant portion of the firm's revenue during that period.
Moreover, Bastion carried out a series of trades on behalf of 11 Solo Clients within a four-day period. These clients then executed opposite positions shortly after, but at significantly different prices. As a result, one Solo client, Ganymede Cayman Ltd (an entity fully owned by the Solo Group's controller), incurred a loss of €22.7 million, while the remaining 10 Solo Clients benefited from this arrangement.
Bastion either ignored or failed to notice several warning signs associated with these trades, which lacked any apparent economic purpose except for transferring funds from the Solo Group's controller to business associates. Bastion should have assessed the financial crime risks when onboarding these Solo Clients and when executing the trades.
Steve Smart, Joint Executive Director of Enforcement and Market Oversight, stated, “Bastion earned substantial fees by executing trades on behalf of the Solo Group that ultimately aimed to make illegitimate tax reclaims from the Danish and Belgian authorities. They failed to identify clear indicators that should have alerted them to the risk of involvement in financial crime. It is crucial for firms to effectively manage these risks.”
This case marks the fifth instance where the FCA has taken action regarding cum-ex trading and forms part of the FCA's broader efforts to address cum-ex dividend arbitrage cases and withholding tax (WHT) schemes. The FCA has actively collaborated with global law enforcement authorities in this regard. The fines imposed by the FCA on firms involved in this trading have surpassed £20 million, considering that these firms earned over £7 million in fees.
As Bastion did not dispute the FCA's findings and agreed to settle, it qualified for a 30% discount under the FCA's Settlement Discount Scheme.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

As of December 1, 2025, a total of 105 companies in the United Kingdom held CFD licences.

Failed to withdraw your funds successfully from the TDFX platform? Did the Australia-based brokerage firm illegitimately take away your trading profits? Have you witnessed losses on the broker’s trading platform due to heavy slippage? Did you also struggle transferring your funds from the TDFX trading account? You are not alone! These allegations have somewhat degraded the rating of the forex broker. Through this TDFX review article, we aim to investigate user complaints so that you can decide whether this trading enterprise is right for you. Keep reading to find our analysis.

With the rapid growth of the global multi-asset investment market, the disparities in the forex industry across different regions have become increasingly evident. As a forex broker information service platform operating in over 200 countries and regions, WikiFX is committed to helping investors in each region identify reliable brokers. Therefore, WikiFX launched a series content — Close Up with WikiFX, which offers in-depth interviews with local brokers. Leveraging WikiFXs robust big data system and industry insights, the series aims to help investors gain a deeper understanding of high-quality brokers. In this exclusive interview, we had the opportunity to speak with Konstantinos Theodorou, CEO of InterStellar Group-Cyprus, to explore the company’s operations and market insights.

BotBro is a Dubai-based forex broker that has continued to grab headlines for years, with its name being involved in one scam after another. In the latest episode, its name was found in the alleged INR 800 crore forex and crypto trading scam in Goa. Top-level agencies, including the Enforcement Directorate (ED), are investigating the case. They have labeled the platform as a Ponzi scheme. The platform is disguised as an AI-powered forex trading app. In connection with this case, the Goa Police Economic Offences Cell (EOC) filed a First Information Report (FIR) against 10 individuals, including the company owner, Lavish Chaudhary Alias Nawab Ali, for fund misappropriation worth over INR 7.3 crore. Read on as we share the BotBro review in this article.