简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
South Korea's GDAC Hacked
Abstract:South Korea’s cryptocurrency exchange GDAC recently reported that hackers stole 23% of digital assets held in its hot wallet which resulted in a loss of nearly $14.2 million.

According to the South Korean cryptocurrency exchange on Monday, hackers stole approximately 23% of digital assets stored in GDAC's hot wallet. GDAC's Chief Executive Officer, Seunghwan Han, confirmed the attack in a statement posted on the company's website on Monday.
GDAC was founded in 2018 and is owned by Streami Inc., a fintech firm focused on creating blockchain technology and digital asset-related services. The exchange has promoted its “Proof of Real Trade” method as a means of preventing market manipulation and ensuring that trade volumes are accurate. Traders are required to validate their transactions using a mobile application that records and verifies transaction data under this scheme.
Han disclosed in the statement that the stolen custodial assets include 60.8 Bitcoin, 350.5 ETH, 10 million WEMIX tokens, and 220,000 USDT. According to the prices of the respective digital assets on CoinMarketCap as of April 10, 2023, the amount of stolen digital assets was $1.7 million, $652.8 million, $11.8 million, and $220,000 million, respectively. This resulted in a total loss of $14.2 million.
Han explained that the hack occurred around 7 a.m. on Sunday, and the stolen cryptocurrencies were transferred to an unidentified wallet. As a result of the incident, the CEO stated that the exchange had suspended and blocked access to its wallet system and servers.

The exchange also stated that the incident had been referred to the police for a cyber investigation. According to the statement, the company also reported the incident to the Korea Internet and Security Agency (KISA). Furthermore, the cryptocurrency exchange reported the hack to the Korea Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU). The FIU is the Korean government agency in charge of coordinating the country's anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing regime.
Regarding GDAC's activities, Han stated that the company is seeking collaboration from asset issuers, exchanges, and decentralised finance managers in order to freeze assets or deposit funds from the address where the withdrawal occurred.
Han further elaborated in Korean that the company is now doing its best by collaborating with a variety of organisations. He also admitted that the resumption of deposit and withdrawal is facing some obstacles at the moment with the ongoing investigation.
In response to the news, the WEMIX Foundation dissociated itself from the attack, stating that all foundation and community assets on its network are secure.
“This incident has had no effect on the quantity and condition of Foundation-managed WEMIX, as well as the security and safety of the platforms, DApp services, and smart contracts,” the Foundation noted.

The Foundation, on the other hand, stated that it had taken actions to assist GDAC in tracing the stolen digital assets, including barring deposits and transfers from suspect wallets on all global exchanges where WEMIX tokens are listed. It has also notified WEMIX bridge service providers, Multi-chain and Orbit Bridge, to tighten security procedures.
The Foundation noted that liquidity offered for Uniswap V3 via the WEMIX-USDC pair had been temporarily withheld to prevent liquidity depletion caused by fraudulent transactions and that its staff would do its utmost to minimise the potential negative impact on the WEMIX community and investors.
Meanwhile, according to recent Chainplay data, over $30 billion has been lost to crypto-related crime in the last ten years. According to the business, cybercrime reached an all-time high in 2022, with USD$12 billion taken in 436 attacks.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

BROKSTOCK Exposed: Traders Report Login Errors, Withdrawal Issues & Incompetent Customer Support
Is your BROKSTOCK trading account full of inefficiencies? Do the recurrent BROKSTOCK login errors prevent you from opening and shorting positions at a favorable price? Has the broker failed to honor your withdrawal requests? Do you face order execution price issues? Has the customer support service failed to resolve your queries? You are not alone! In this BROKSTOCK review article, we have shared some complaints that need a close introspection. Read on to explore them.

OmegaPro Review: Traders Flood Comment Sections with Withdrawal Denials & Scam Complaints
Has your deposit and withdrawal scenario worsened after the initial good experience at OmegaPro, a UK-based forex broker? Does the broker ask you to invest when withdrawing your funds? Did the broker officials trap you with their false promises of compound interest on your deposit? Have you found it impossible to transfer funds from your OmegaPro login to another broker’s account? Do you witness a lack of support when dealing with these unfortunate trading circumstances? These are no longer isolated complaints — they have allegedly become the reason for OmegaPro’s tarnished trust and reputation within the trading community. Read on as we share the OmegaPro review in this article.

Inzo Broker Review 2025: A Complete Look at Features, Costs and User Claims
Inzo Broker presents itself as a modern forex and CFD broker, started in 2021 and registered in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. At first glance, it offers an attractive package for traders: access to the popular MetaTrader 5 (MT5) and cTrader platforms, different types of accounts for various budget levels, and a wide selection of assets to trade. These features are made to attract both new and experienced traders. However, a closer look shows a big difference between these advertised benefits and the real risks. The broker works under an offshore regulatory system, which gives limited protection to investors. More importantly, Inzo has collected many serious user complaints, especially about withdrawing funds and changing trading conditions unfairly. This mix of weak oversight and serious user claims creates a high-risk situation that potential clients must carefully think about. This review will break down these parts to give a clear, fact-based view.

An Unbiased Review of INZO Broker for Indian Traders: What You Must Know
INZO is a fairly new company in the online trading world. It started in 2021 and is registered in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. Traders in India and around the world have noticed this broker because it offers access to popular trading platforms such as MetaTrader 5 (MT5) and cTrader. It also lets you trade many different things, such as foreign currencies, stocks, and digital currencies. The broker tries to be easy to use with features such as a low minimum deposit, which can be appealing to new traders. However, when you look more closely, the situation becomes more complicated. INZO operates as an offshore-regulated company, which brings certain risks that every trader needs to understand. Also, user feedback is very mixed - there are many serious complaints alongside some positive experiences. Read on this in-depth review of the broker.

