WikiFX Valentine's Message | Trade Safely, Together Every Step of the Way
In the Forex Market, Trust Is Not a Promise — It’s Verified Through Safety, Transparency, and Support
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:The companies were also charged with position limit violations and reporting failures. The violations occurred between April 22 and May 1, 2020.

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), the US derivatives industry regulator, has slammed a fine of $720,000 on Chinese companies COFCO Corporation and Chinatex Corporation Limited.
Take Advantage of the Biggest Financial Event in London. This year we have expanded to new verticals in Online Trading, Fintech, Digital Assets, Blockchain, and Payments.
The fine is to settle charges of wash trading, position limit violations, and reporting failures instituted by the regulatory body against the companies.
CFTC on Friday said it issued an order simultaneously filing and settling the charges against the firms.
“The order finds that between April 22 and May 1, 2020, Chinatex traders engaged in wash trading in order to liquidate a long position in the account of an affiliated company and re-establish the position in its own account, to the ultimate benefit of its parent company, COFCO,” the regulator explained in a statement.
CFTCs order asked the firms to “desist from violating the Commodity Exchange Act and CFTC regulations, as charged.”
Explaining how the wash trading took place, CFTC noted that Chinatex traders entered purchase orders for Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) Cotton No. 2 futures in their accounts.
They also simultaneously entered offsetting sale orders in the account of an affiliate, the watchdog said.
“The offsetting orders were for the same delivery month, and at prices that were typically within one price tick of each other. The traders structured the orders to ensure that one set of offsetting orders were filled before entering the next set,” CFTC explained.
It added, “The orders were not intended to take a bona fide position in the market, but rather to liquidate and re-establish a position while minimizing risk and price competition.”
In the issued order, CFTC said it also found COFCO guilty of violating the rules on speculative position limit while it was trading the ICE Cotton No. 2 futures contracts.
The regulator explained, According to the order, in March 2020, various aggregated subsidiaries of COFCO held net short positions in excess of the 5,000-contract single- and all-month position limits then applicable.
“Similarly, in November 2021, several subsidiaries of COFCO held net short positions in excess of the 5,950-contract single-month position limit then applicable. The subsidiaries also failed to file certain required reports accurately reflecting their cash-market exposure.”
According to CFTC, on July 20, the ICE Futures US, a marketplace for futures and options trading, settled a disciplinary action against Chinatex and an affiliate for trade practice violations.
The disciplinary action also covered for the firm and affiliates conducts said to have been detrimental to the exchange.
Additionally, it covered for their unauthorized use of trader identification information, position limit violations, misuse of a hedge exemption, and supervisory failure.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

In the Forex Market, Trust Is Not a Promise — It’s Verified Through Safety, Transparency, and Support

Did you face losses due to a sudden change in the trading price on the datian platform? Were your transaction records deleted by the Hong Kong-based forex broker? Did the broker liquidate your trading account multiple times despite not reaching the stage where it mandated this move? Have you experienced heavy slippage on the trading platform? Concerned by these issues, traders have complained about the broker online. We will let you know of these with attached screenshots in this datian review article. Keep reading!

Did you face constant rejections of your fund withdrawal applications by TopstepFX? Have you been denied withdrawals in the name of hedging? Did you witness an account block without any clear explanation from the forex broker? There have been numerous user claims against TopstepFX regarding its withdrawals, payout delays and other issues. In the TopstepFX review article, we have investigated the top complaints against the US-based forex broker. Keep reading!

When choosing a broker, the first question is always about safety and legitimacy. Is my capital safe? For Mazi Finance, the answer is clear and worrying: Mazi Finance is an unregulated broker. While the company, MaziMatic Financial Services LTD, is registered in the offshore location of Saint Lucia, this business registration does not replace strong financial regulation from a top-level authority. Independent analysis from regulatory watchdogs shows a very low trust score, made worse by official warnings from government financial bodies and many user complaints about serious problems. This article provides a clear, fact-based analysis of the Mazi Finance regulation status. Our goal is to break down the facts and present the risks clearly, helping you make an informed decision and protect your capital.