简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
FSCA will use its enforcement powers to promote transformation
Abstract:The FSCA has outlined how it intends to promote transformation in the financial sector, both now and, more importantly, once the Conduct of Financial Institutions (Cofi) Bill becomes law. This week, the Authority released, for public comment, its draft strategy for promoting financial sector transformation.
The FSCA has outlined how it intends to promote transformation in the financial sector, both now and, more importantly, once the Conduct of Financial Institutions (Cofi) Bill becomes law.
This week, the Authority released, for public comment, its draft strategy for promoting financial sector transformation.
Cofi will empower the FSCA to set transformation targets for financial institutions and enforce them. The Authority will also be able to impose penalties for non-compliance.
National Treasury has previously stated that it aims to table Cofi by April.
The FSCA says it has adopted a two-phase approach to promoting transformation. Phase 1 focuses on the role that the FSCA will play within the current legislative framework, while the focus of Phase 2 is its role within Cofi.

The legislative and supervisory framework for transformation in the financial sector consists of:
The Broad-based Black Economic Empowerment Act (B-BBEEA). The B-BBEE Commission supervises adherence to the Act. The Act does not oblige enterprises to achieve specific B-BBEE targets. It does make it a criminal offence to misrepresent an enterprises BEE status.
The Financial Sector Code (FSC), which is set and monitored by the Financial Sector Transformation Council (FSTC). The council does not have the power to take action against enterprises that do not achieve the codes targets or that fail to report on their compliance with the code.
The Financial Sector Regulation Act (FSRA) and the Insurance Act. The Prudential Authority supervises the transformation requirements of the latter.
However, the provisions of the Insurance Act are an interim measure. Once Cofi takes effect, the FSCA will supervise the transformation of all financial institutions in terms of the FSRA and Cofi.
Cofi places requirements on financial institutions regarding transformation, including having a transformation plan and promoting transformation in line with that plan.
Enforcement action
According to the FSCAs draft strategy, one of the key strengths of the FSCA in supporting transformation of the financial sector is its ability to take enforcement action against financial institutions. This is in contrast to other stakeholders such as the FSTC, which is not able to sanction institutions, and even the B-BBEE Commission, whose administrative actions are limited to instances of fraud or misrepresentation.
“The FSCA will ultimately be able to take action against financial institutions that do not adhere to commitments made in terms of their transformation plans.”
In line with Cofi and the amended FSRA, the FSCA says it could do the following to promote transformation:
Require financial institutions to have a transformation plan aimed at achieving targets set under the FSC;
Set minimum B-BBEE levels that must be targeted by each firm, particularly larger firms;
Consider transformation plans during the licensing process;
Supervise the progress of financial institutions against their plans;
Take action when there is a lack of commitment to, or achievement of targets, set in transformation plans; and
Minimise regulatory barriers to entry for small, black-owned entities and support small black businesses with suitably enabling regulatory compliance requirements.
The FSCA says it is envisaged that all financial institutions with revenue of more than R10 million a year should have a B-BBEE score of Level 4 or have a transformation plan that demonstrates how they will reach this level within five years.
The Authority says that, in Phase 2 of its strategy, it could take the following action when financial institutions fail to meet the targets in their transformation plans:
Engaging with an institutions board on the importance of transformation;
Requesting a remedial plan to address the shortcomings, which can take the form of an enforceable undertaking;
Issuing a directive for non-compliance with an enforceable undertaking; and
Issuing an administrative penalty for non-compliance with Cofi Acts transformation requirements, an enforceable undertaking or a directive.
Phase 1 objectives
In the meantime, until Cofi takes effect, the FSCAs objectives will include:
Engaging with financial institutions on their transformation plans and levels of compliance. The FSCA will include “a transformation focus” during its engagements with financial institutions. The purpose will be to assess the current levels of transformation within the sector and evaluate the maturity of transformation plans that those institutions may have in place to improve their achievement of targets under the FSC over time.
Supporting the FSTC in collecting data on transformation, particularly in relation to ownership. The FSCA will also undertake a data collection and clean-up exercise to improve the information it holds regarding the ownership of licensed financial institutions.
Strengthening its engagements with the FSTC and the B-BBEE Commission, to improve the co-ordination of efforts aimed at promoting transformation of the financial sector.
Supporting small businesses in the financial sector. The FSCA says its Inclusive Business Model Support Unit will conduct training and support workshops for SMEs and entrepreneurs in the financial sector, focused on compliance, readiness for licensing, and support for regulatory examinations. In Phase 2, the units work will be expanded to include more general operational business support.
Developing licensing, regulatory and supervisory frameworks that promote transformation of the financial sector. The FSCA says that licensing, regulatory and supervisory requirements “should not in themselves pose a barrier to entry for small financial institutions, particularly those owned by previously disadvantaged individuals. In support of transformation, the FSCA will develop regulatory and supervisory frameworks and instruments that allow for proportional application of requirements, minimising undue barriers to entry and compliance burdens. Where appropriate, regulatory instruments may also introduce explicit requirements aimed at transformation.”
The FSCA says it will continue to participate in the development of the Cofi Bill and the consequential amendments to the FSRA, “to ensure that transformation is adequately provided for, in a way that can be appropriately regulated and supervised by the FSCA”.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

OmegaPro Review: Traders Flood Comment Sections with Withdrawal Denials & Scam Complaints
Has your deposit and withdrawal scenario worsened after the initial good experience at OmegaPro, a UK-based forex broker? Does the broker ask you to invest when withdrawing your funds? Did the broker officials trap you with their false promises of compound interest on your deposit? Have you found it impossible to transfer funds from your OmegaPro login to another broker’s account? Do you witness a lack of support when dealing with these unfortunate trading circumstances? These are no longer isolated complaints — they have allegedly become the reason for OmegaPro’s tarnished trust and reputation within the trading community. Read on as we share the OmegaPro review in this article.

Inzo Broker Review 2025: A Complete Look at Features, Costs and User Claims
Inzo Broker presents itself as a modern forex and CFD broker, started in 2021 and registered in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. At first glance, it offers an attractive package for traders: access to the popular MetaTrader 5 (MT5) and cTrader platforms, different types of accounts for various budget levels, and a wide selection of assets to trade. These features are made to attract both new and experienced traders. However, a closer look shows a big difference between these advertised benefits and the real risks. The broker works under an offshore regulatory system, which gives limited protection to investors. More importantly, Inzo has collected many serious user complaints, especially about withdrawing funds and changing trading conditions unfairly. This mix of weak oversight and serious user claims creates a high-risk situation that potential clients must carefully think about. This review will break down these parts to give a clear, fact-based view.

An Unbiased Review of INZO Broker for Indian Traders: What You Must Know
INZO is a fairly new company in the online trading world. It started in 2021 and is registered in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. Traders in India and around the world have noticed this broker because it offers access to popular trading platforms such as MetaTrader 5 (MT5) and cTrader. It also lets you trade many different things, such as foreign currencies, stocks, and digital currencies. The broker tries to be easy to use with features such as a low minimum deposit, which can be appealing to new traders. However, when you look more closely, the situation becomes more complicated. INZO operates as an offshore-regulated company, which brings certain risks that every trader needs to understand. Also, user feedback is very mixed - there are many serious complaints alongside some positive experiences. Read on this in-depth review of the broker.

Russian crypto millionaire couple found dismembered and buried in Dubai desert
A gruesome case has emerged involving a Russian couple living in the United Arab Emirates who went missing in early October and whose remains were recently discovered in a desert near Dubai. Roman Novak, a self-styled cryptocurrency “millionaire”, and his wife Anna had last been seen travelling to a supposed investor meeting in the UAE, but according to investigators were instead abducted and murdered after a ransom plot failed.

