天眼評分
RCB
https://www.rcbcy.com/
官方網址
評分指數
影響力
影響力
C
影響力指數 NO.1
聯繫方式
暫未查證到有效監管資訊,請注意風險!
- 經查證,該交易商當前暫無有效外匯監管,請注意風險!
瀏覽RCB 的用戶還瀏覽了..
PU Prime
VT Markets
搜索來源
投放語言
市場分析
素材投放
官網鑒定
rcbcy.com
185.31.208.71伺服器所在地德國
備案號--主要訪問國家/地區--功能變數名稱創建時間--網站名稱--所屬公司--
關係族譜
相關企業
公司簡介
| RCB 檢討摘要 | |
| 成立年份 | 2002 |
| 註冊國家 | 塞浦路斯 |
| 監管 | 無監管 |
| 客戶支援 | 電郵:rcb@rcbcy.com |
| 地址:塞浦路斯利馬索斯特街2號 | |
RCB 資訊
RCB 成立於2002年,並在塞浦路斯註冊。該機構未受塞浦路斯證監會或任何主要國際金融監管機構監管。截至目前,該銀行已正式停止所有金融業務,不再提供投資或銀行服務。

優缺點
| 優點 | 缺點 |
| 悠久的運營歷史 | 無監管 |
| 在塞浦路斯市場上有知名度 | 已正式停止所有服務 |
| 沒有交易平台、產品或客戶工具可用 |
RCB 是否合法?
RCB (rcbcy.com) 並非受監管的經紀商。儘管註冊於塞浦路斯,但並未獲得塞浦路斯證監會CySEC的執照,該機構是塞浦路斯的官方金融監管機構。

根據Whois數據,域名rcbcy.com於2002年3月21日註冊,最後更新日期為2024年3月11日。目前仍然活躍,設定到期日為2029年3月21日。

產品與服務
RCB 銀行的官方網站(rcbcy.com)證實該銀行已停止所有銀行業務。網站顯示了一則結業公告,感謝客戶在過去27年中對其的信任。儘管域名仍在運作,但該網站聲稱RCB不再是一家運作中的銀行或經紀商,因為它不提供任何金融服務。
企業畫像
- 5-10年
- 監管牌照存疑
- 展業區域存疑
- 高級風險隱患
Wiki問答
How do RCB’s overnight financing costs stack up against those of other brokers?
After a thorough review of RCB’s background and current status, I must state that evaluating their overnight financing costs—or any trading conditions—is effectively impossible at this time. My experience as a trader has taught me that regulatory status and transparency are essential foundations for assessing key aspects like swap rates. In RCB’s case, not only are they completely unregulated, but they have also officially ceased all financial and brokerage operations. Their website confirms the closure and withdrawal from all investment and banking services, which means there are no active trading platforms, instruments, or customer support channels. From my perspective, any historical information about RCB’s previous overnight financing costs is irrelevant today since the broker no longer provides any services to clients. Comparing RCB to active, regulated brokers—whose financing costs can be systematically evaluated—is, therefore, not applicable. For those seeking reliable overnight financing terms, I strongly recommend focusing only on brokers that are properly licensed and operational. Risk management, transparency, and the ability to access clear cost structures are simply not possible with entities like RCB at this stage. For me, the absence of valid regulation and the official shutdown make RCB a non-option; I wouldn’t consider them for trading, let alone for competitive financing rates.
Does RCB apply any fees when you deposit or withdraw funds?
Speaking as an experienced trader, I need to emphasize that RCB no longer provides any form of banking or trading services, including deposit or withdrawal functionality. The closure announcement on their official website clearly states that the bank has ceased all financial operations and no longer offers investment or banking activities. In practical terms, this means there are currently no deposit or withdrawal methods, so the question of whether any fees apply is now irrelevant. Back when RCB was operational, details about transaction fees would have been an important consideration for me—unexplained charges or non-transparent fee structures are clear warning signs and can significantly affect trading performance. However, given that RCB is not regulated and has officially stopped its financial activities, even attempting to interact with this entity carries extremely high risk. To protect my capital and personal information, I would personally avoid any involvement until there is legitimate, up-to-date regulatory oversight and clear public documentation of all client terms, including fees. My priority is always to seek out brokers with full transparency and active, verifiable regulation.
Does RCB charge a commission for each lot traded on their ECN or raw spread accounts?
After carefully researching RCB, I can say with confidence that it is not possible to determine any commission structure for ECN or raw spread accounts, simply because RCB no longer provides any financial or trading services. From my perspective as a forex trader, it is critical to confirm that a broker is both active and properly regulated before even considering their fee schedules or trading conditions. In RCB’s case, the most relevant fact is that the company, despite its previous presence in the Cyprus market, has officially ceased all services. Their website contains a notice about the termination of financial operations, and there are no trading platforms, products, or support tools currently available. Even during its active period, RCB’s lack of a CySEC or any recognized international brokerage license already represented a major red flag for me regarding safety and transparency. Without regulation, there’s no robust investor protection or oversight of trading terms—another reason I would approach any offerings, including potential commission models, with caution. Ultimately, since RCB is not operational, they do not charge commissions for any type of trading account, ECN or otherwise. For my own safety and peace of mind, I only consider brokers that are both fully regulated and demonstrably active in the market.
Is RCB overseen by regulators, and if so, which financial authorities are responsible for its regulation?
Based on my own experience and a careful review of the available facts, I can say that RCB is not overseen by any recognized regulatory authority. Although the company has a long history and is registered in Cyprus, it does not hold a license from CySEC or any other major international financial regulator. In my career, I have learned that regulatory oversight is not just a formality—it’s a critical foundation for trader protection, dispute resolution, and overall trust. Without regulation, there are no industry safeguards to ensure fair practices or compensation in the event of broker mismanagement or insolvency. From what I’ve seen, any financial entity lacking valid, transparent supervision introduces a much higher degree of risk for investors. This caution is doubly important here: not only does RCB lack regulation, but as of now, it has publicly ceased all banking and investment operations. As a trader, I would not consider entrusting funds or personal data to a company in this situation. For me, the “why” is straightforward: regulatory status isn’t just about legal requirements—it’s about risk management and confidence in every transaction. When a broker has no oversight at all, I simply move on and look for one that does.
你要評價的內容
請輸入...
