점수
Fortex
https://www.fortex.com/en/
공식 사이트
평점 지수
영향력
영향력
C
영향력 지수 NO.1
연락처
효력 있는 규제 정보가 없습니다. 위험에 유의해 주세요!
- 이 브로커는 현재 효력 있는 규제가 없는 것으로 확인되었습니다. 위험에 유의하시기 바랍니다!
Fortex 을(를) 본 사용자는 또다시 열람했습니다...
XM
STARTRADER
IC Markets Global
AVATRADE
웹사이트 감정
fortex.com
52.42.120.14서버 위치미국
ICP 등록번호--주요 방문 국가/지역--도메인 생성 날짜2001-08-07웹사이트 이름WHOIS.NETWORKSOLUTIONS.COM회사NETWORK SOLUTIONS, LLC.
관계 계보
관련 기업
회사 소개
| Fortex Review Summary | |
| 설립 | 1997 |
| 등록 국가/지역 | 미국 |
| 규제 | 규제 없음 |
| 제품 | MT4/5 Bridge OMX, Fortex XCloud, Fortex ECN 솔루션, Fortex 7 & AlgoX |
| 고객 지원 | 라이브 채팅, 문의 양식 |
| 전화: 650.591.8822 | |
| 팩스: 650.591.8818 | |
| 이메일: info@fortex.com, support@fortex.com | |
| 소셜 미디어: Twitter, LinkedIn, Facebook, YouTube | |
| 실리콘밸리 본사: Palo Alto Square, 3000 El Camino Real, Building 4, Suite 200, Palo Alto, CA 94306, 미국 | |
| 다른 지점 연락처: https://www.fortex.com/en/con | |
Fortex 정보
실리콘밸리에 본사를 둔 Fortex은 미들웨어, API 및 다양한 거래 상담, 분석 및 맞춤 서비스부터 데스크톱, 웹 또는 모바일 거래용 최종 사용자 응용 프로그램까지 기술 솔루션을 제공하는 기술 공급업체입니다.
그러나 현재 해당 브로커는 권위 기관의 유효한 규제 없이 운영되고 있으며, 이는 그의 신뢰성과 신뢰성을 저하시킵니다.

장단점
| 장점 | 단점 |
| 다년간의 산업 경험 | 규제 없음 |
| 라이브 채팅 지원 | |
| 다양한 연락처 채널 |
규제 상태
규제는 중개업체의 합법성과 신뢰성을 평가하는 중요한 측면이며, Fortex의 경우 해당 브로커는 유효한 규제 감독 없이 운영됩니다. 규제 프레임워크의 부재는 해당 브로커의 산업 기준 준수, 재무 투명성 및 고객 이익 보호에 대한 염려를 일으킵니다.

제품 및 서비스
금융 기업을 위한 기술 공급업체인 Fortex은 자체 제품 목록을 통해 전 세계의 거래자, 중개업체, 유동성 제공업체, 자금 관리자, 은행, 헤지 펀드 및 투자자에게 다양한 기술 솔루션 서비스를 제공합니다.
유동성 접근
Fortex Bridge OMX는 MT4/5 트레이더가 Equinix NY4, HK1 및 LD4 시설을 통해 글로벌 유동성 제공업체에 연결되어 서브-1ms 왕복 거래 시간과 깊은 유동성 풀에 원활한 액세스를 보장합니다.

저지연
인프라Fortex XCloud는 전용 데이터 센터를 통해 고주파, 저지연 연결성을 제공하여 티어 1 유동성 제공업체와 수천 개의 동시 주문을 효율적으로 실행할 수 있습니다.

거래 플랫폼
Fortex ECN 플랫폼은 Fortex 7과 AlgoX를 포함하여 통화, 상품, CFD 및 주식 거래에 대한 포괄적인 스위트를 제공하며 사용자 친화적인 인터페이스와 강력한 알고리즘 거래 기능을 갖추고 있습니다.

포괄적인 솔루션
Fortex은 글로벌 유동성 집계, 클라우드 기반 인프라 및 고급 거래 엔진을 통합하여 가장 완벽한 다중 자산 ECN 거래 생태계를 제공합니다.

키워드
- 5-10년
- 의문 있는 규제 라이선스
- 잠재적 위험성이 높음
위키 Q&A
Is a free demo account available with Fortex, and if so, are there any restrictions, such as a time limit on its use?
Based on my close review of Fortex, I did not find any explicit mention of a free demo account or its specific restrictions, such as time limits, within the available information. While Fortex positions itself primarily as a technology provider rather than a conventional retail broker, it does offer platforms like Fortex 7 and AlgoX and provides trading infrastructure to various clients in the industry. In my experience, most reputable brokers make their demo account policies transparent by clearly stating if and how traders can simulate live trading with virtual funds. The absence of a clearly advertised free demo account at Fortex is something I regard as a potential drawback, especially for those who value transparency and risk management when testing new platforms or strategies. Given their unregulated status and the high-risk warning attached to Fortex, I am particularly cautious about engaging with any service that does not lay out its demo trading conditions in detail. Without regulatory oversight, it is essential to have all relevant terms—demo or live—fully disclosed. Personally, I expect clear, accessible information regarding demo accounts as part of a broker or platform’s commitment to customer experience and financial safety. Until I could confirm the details directly from Fortex, I would not assume a free, unrestricted demo environment is available for prospective users. For me, this lack of clarity contributes significantly to my overall risk assessment of the provider.
What would you identify as the primary advantages and disadvantages of trading through Fortex?
Based on my experience and after closely examining Fortex, I find the evaluation complex and it requires caution, especially when making decisions about where to entrust my trading capital. A clear advantage for me is Fortex’s technological offering—its suite of ECN trading platforms, including Fortex 7 and AlgoX, plus direct liquidity access and low-latency infrastructure, stand out as sophisticated features designed for both high-frequency and algorithmic trading. Over the years, this kind of tech focus has often translated to faster executions and potentially lower trading costs, both important for my strategy. However, the absence of any valid regulatory oversight is, in my judgment, a critical drawback. Regulation exists not just as a bureaucratic requirement, but to uphold transparency, protect client interests, and provide recourse in the case of disputes or broker failures. With Fortex lacking such oversight, I am left without assurance regarding the segregation of client funds, dispute resolution, or adherence to industry standards. User experiences seem mixed—some describe stable conditions and satisfactory performance, while others raise serious concerns over trade execution integrity and insufficient customer support. In short, while the technical infrastructure might appeal to advanced traders like myself, the regulatory gap represents a significant risk I cannot overlook. Personally, I would approach trading with Fortex very cautiously, prioritizing safety and capital protection above all else.
How do Fortex’s swap fees for overnight positions stack up against those charged by other brokers?
Assessing Fortex’s overnight swap fees compared to other brokers is challenging, as the available information doesn’t clearly specify their fee structure for holding positions overnight. In my experience as a trader, the transparency and competitiveness of swap rates are very important; established and regulated brokers typically make these details public and easily accessible. However, with Fortex, not only is there a lack of regulation—raising my personal caution levels—but there’s also limited data on their actual trading costs, including swap fees. From what I could gather, Fortex is positioned more as a technology provider and liquidity bridge than a client-facing retail broker, which complicates direct swaps comparisons. Most of the industry’s reputable brokers list their overnight financing costs clearly, helping me to calculate my long-term trade expenses and risk management. The absence of publicly available swap rate information from Fortex would force me to reach out directly to their team or possibly even open an account just to access these details, which is far from ideal for informed decision-making. Ultimately, because I place heavy emphasis on transparency and regulatory oversight—especially when it comes to any fees that can erode trading profits over time—I would be very cautious about engaging with a broker that does not disclose its swap fees upfront or is not regulated. For me, this makes it impossible to confidently compare Fortex’s swap costs with those of more established brokers.
Would it be safe and reliable to trade with Fortex as my broker?
In my experience as a trader, the first thing I look for in any broker is robust regulatory oversight. With Fortex, this is immediately a concern—there is no valid regulation in place according to all available data. For me, this is a significant red flag because regulation is not simply a bureaucratic formality; it’s an essential safeguard for trader funds and a mechanism to hold brokers accountable to fair practices. Operating without supervision undermines a broker’s credibility, raises questions about financial transparency, and, most importantly, complicates recourse for clients in the event of disputes or issues with execution. While Fortex has an established presence in the industry and offers sophisticated technology solutions and fast order execution, none of this can replace the protection that legitimate oversight provides. My exposure to unregulated entities, even those with innovative platforms or positive user feedback, has always been overshadowed by the increased risks—especially when it comes to withdrawal and dispute resolution. There are also neutral and negative user reports that echo concerns such as trade manipulation and lack of effective customer service. In my view, these should not be taken lightly, since real-time communication and transparency are critical when problems arise. To sum up, based on what I know and what I value as a trader—security of funds, dispute protection, and regulatory transparency—I would not consider Fortex a safe or reliable choice for trading. The risks associated with their unregulated status are too significant for my comfort.
사용자리뷰 3
댓글을 달고 싶은 내용
입력해 주세요....

