점수
Tiger Markets(test)
http://www.tigermarketsld.com
공식 사이트
평점 지수
영향력
영향력
C
영향력 지수 NO.1
연락처
계정 정보
- 환경--
- 통화--
- 최대 레버리지--
- 지원EA
- 최소 입금--
- 최소 스프레드--
- 입금 방식(4+) VISA Neteller MASTER Bank transfer
- 출금 방식--
- 최소 포지션--
- 커미션--
- 거래 종목123123
Tiger Markets(test) 을(를) 본 사용자는 또다시 열람했습니다...
STARTRADER
Vantage
XM
fpmarkets
웹사이트 감정
tigermarketsld.com
3.33.130.190서버 위치미국
ICP 등록번호--주요 방문 국가/지역--도메인 생성 날짜--웹사이트 이름--회사--
관계 계보
위키 Q&A
In what ways does Tiger Markets(test)'s regulatory standing help safeguard my funds?
Based on my experience as a forex trader, I've learned that regulatory oversight is one crucial factor when evaluating a broker's reliability, especially regarding the safety of client funds. Tiger Markets (test) claims to be regulated in Cyprus under a CYSEC license and appears to employ a Straight Through Processing (STP) model. Regulation in Cyprus theoretically means the broker must follow certain financial and procedural standards, such as maintaining segregated accounts and reporting regularly to authorities, which can reduce some risks of misconduct or insolvency. However, what stood out to me is the medium potential risk rating and exposures posted by users, particularly frequent complaints about withdrawal issues and trade execution problems. This pattern gives me pause, because robust regulation should, in principle, help protect traders from these exact scenarios by providing avenues for recourse and ensuring accountability. In my view, while CYSEC regulation might offer some framework for client protection, it's not a guarantee of safety or reliable operations. I've seen that regulation can help, but it's not a substitute for careful due diligence on a broker’s business practices, responsiveness, and transparency. For me, Tiger Markets (test)'s regulatory status could offer some safeguards in theory, but the user complaints indicate gaps that merit caution before considering any substantial deposit.
What's the smallest amount I’m allowed to withdraw at once from my Tiger Markets (test) account?
As an experienced trader who evaluates brokers with care, I have to say that with Tiger Markets (test), I was unable to determine a clear minimum withdrawal amount from the information presented. I always prioritize transparent withdrawal terms because the ability to access funds efficiently is a key trust factor for me. In my own trading, I have encountered situations where lack of clarity around withdrawal policies created unnecessary delays and concerns, so I scrutinize this aspect closely. For Tiger Markets (test), despite their mention of accepted funding methods such as VISA, Neteller, Master, and bank transfers, I did not find specific figures or conditions relating to the smallest withdrawal allowed. This is essential information; without it, I have to exercise heightened caution. Additionally, I noticed several user reports highlighting withdrawal difficulties on this platform, which, combined with a medium risk and some regulatory ambiguities, raises concerns about reliability and fund accessibility. Given the lack of publicly listed minimums and the experiences shared by other users, I recommend proceeding very carefully and making sure you verify withdrawal terms directly with their support before depositing. When real money is at stake, especially in forex, I cannot overstate the importance of clear, upfront policies and responsive customer service. For me, this lack of transparency is a significant red flag.
Could you give an in-depth overview of the fee structure for Tiger Markets (test), covering both commission charges and spreads?
As an experienced trader, my assessment of Tiger Markets (test) makes it clear that understanding their fee structure is challenging due to a significant lack of transparency. From my research, I couldn’t find detailed or reliable information about the specific spreads, commission charges, or even the minimum deposit required. Though some data fields reference numbers for “minimum deposit” and “commission,” it’s unclear whether these are placeholders or valid figures, making it impossible for me to confidently factor them into any trading cost calculations. What gives me pause is the absence of clear data on spreads—which is critical information for everyday cost management as a trader. Reliable brokers generally publish detailed tables for both commission and spread structures on major currency pairs, but here, there’s none of that clarity. Furthermore, while the platform claims to offer “Straight Through Processing (STP)” and cTrader, that alone doesn’t guarantee tight spreads or competitive commissions. The fee structure’s opacity is further complicated by user complaints regarding withdrawal issues and platform function, raising concerns about overall trustworthiness. As a rule, I need to see clear, independently verifiable cost disclosures before committing funds to any broker. For me, the lack of transparency around the actual fee structure at Tiger Markets (test) is a cautionary red flag and something that should not be overlooked.
Does Tiger Markets offer a swap-free (Islamic) account option for traders?
From my careful review of the available data, I could not find any explicit indication that Tiger Markets offers a swap-free (Islamic) account option. In my own trading, especially when considering brokers for religious compliance or for a specific trading strategy, the clear availability and documented terms of swap-free accounts are crucial, as these accounts are designed to comply with Sharia law by removing interest charges on overnight positions. When I look for this feature, I expect to see detailed information regarding eligibility, application process, and any potential administrative fees. Unfortunately, Tiger Markets’ information does not specify this kind of account, and several core aspects like the minimum deposit structure and account features are either unclear or missing. Additionally, the presence of unresolved user complaints—particularly about withdrawal difficulties and position closure issues—gives me further pause when evaluating the trustworthiness of their offerings. If swap-free trading is a vital requirement, I would personally be hesitant to proceed with Tiger Markets until they provide more transparent and comprehensive disclosures about their account types and operational policies. For now, in my assessment, traders seeking an Islamic account should be extremely cautious and look for more straightforward confirmations from the broker before considering them.
사용자리뷰 6
댓글을 달고 싶은 내용
입력해 주세요....
평가 6
이 브로커는 예시입니다.
모든 데이터는 데스트 데이터입니다.
이해했습니다.







下一次看海约在哪
아일랜드
왜 항상 자금을 인출할 수 없는 플랫폼을 만나게 되는 걸까요? 너무 답답합니다.
신고
Serendipity8888
미국
최근 자금을 인출할 수 없어서 여러 차례의 커뮤니케이션이 효과가 없었습니다. 이 플랫폼의 나쁜 행동을 여기서 공개하여 관련 부서가 주의를 기울이고 자금을 회수할 수 있기를 바랍니다. 정말 감사합니다.
신고
7778889
홍콩
좋은 거래 업체
중간 평가
7778889
홍콩
좋은 플랫폼 좋은 플랫폼
좋은 평가
Serendipity8888
일본
가운데
중간 평가
Serendipity8888
일본
그것은 좋다
좋은 평가