Going Securities

Based on my careful review of Going Securities, automated trading with Expert Advisors (EAs) does not appear to be available on their platform. As a trader who relies significantly on the flexibility and integration of EAs within my own strategies, I consider the type of trading platform offered a critical factor. Going Securities currently provides their proprietary platform called “Going Securities Pro”, which is accessible via mobile. From my experience, proprietary platforms usually do not match the third-party compatibility of established platforms like MetaTrader 4 (MT4) or MetaTrader 5 (MT5), both of which are globally recognized for robust EA support. This matters to me because automated trading requires not only technical compatibility but also a stable, transparent environment for scripting and deploying EAs. Without clear details on API access, algorithmic strategy support, or dedicated automation tools, I would approach claims of EA functionality cautiously. While the company does hold legitimate SFC regulation—which gives me some measure of reassurance from a risk management perspective—there is no indication that the platform officially supports Expert Advisors or similar automated trading modules. In my opinion, traders focused on algorithmic strategies should clarify such capabilities directly with the broker before considering them for automated trading. For now, I would keep expectations conservative regarding EA support with Going Securities.

From my experience as a trader and based on the regulatory environment that Going Securities operates within, particularly under the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC), initial withdrawals typically require standard identity and account verification. Generally, I have needed to provide a government-issued photo ID such as a passport or identity card, as well as a recent proof of address—like a utility bill or bank statement from the last three months. The broker’s regulated status means strict anti-money laundering procedures are in place, so ensuring all personal information matches precisely between the provided documents and the account details is essential. While Going Securities does not publicly clarify every detail about its withdrawal process or document requirements, my cautious approach with any regulated broker is to expect a detailed Know Your Customer (KYC) check. This can mean requests for additional documents, especially if there are any discrepancies. I avoid funding or trading significant amounts until this documentation process is completed, as delays can otherwise occur. Contacting customer service directly at the provided channels for specific documentation requirements before submitting a withdrawal request has always helped me avoid unnecessary setbacks.

In my experience evaluating brokers, I found that Going Securities does not openly detail different account types on their website or in publicly available sources, which immediately stands out to me. Unlike many brokers that clearly outline various account offerings—such as standard, ECN, or VIP with differentiating features—Going Securities instead focuses its attention on regulated futures and securities trading, asset and wealth management, and investment research. All these services are provided through what appears to be a singular proprietary platform, "Going Securities Pro." As someone who values transparency, the lack of clarity regarding specific account types or tiered structures makes it difficult for me to assess potential fit for different trader profiles. This gap also extends to their fee structure, which is marked as “unclear” based on my research. That said, the firm's SFC regulation does provide a measure of client protection and credibility, which I always view as critical. For me, this means I would only proceed with extra caution—reaching out to their customer support directly for a thorough understanding of what is offered before making any commitment. In short, while their regulatory status is reassuring, the absence of detailed account specifications makes comparative evaluations challenging and warrants careful due diligence.

Based on my personal experience evaluating brokers, I believe Going Securities offers certain notable advantages, though I urge every trader to perform their own due diligence before committing funds. The first benefit for me is that Going Securities is regulated by the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) in Hong Kong. As regulations can provide an added layer of accountability and set baseline standards for client protection, I consider this an important aspect, especially in today’s market environment where regulatory oversight varies widely among brokers. Secondly, Going Securities has a strong presence not only in Hong Kong but also globally, including locations such as Toronto, Abu Dhabi, and Singapore. In my own trading journey, I’ve found that brokers with international reach are often better positioned to provide diverse market access and more robust client services, which allows me as a trader to potentially tap into different market opportunities with a higher degree of confidence. Lastly, I find value in the breadth of their offerings. The ability to access futures, securities trading, asset management, and investment research—all under one roof—means that I can consider various strategies without managing multiple accounts across different platforms. However, I am cautious about the lack of clear fee structure information, and I always recommend thoroughly clarifying all costs with any broker beforehand to avoid surprises. For me, these combined factors—regulation, global presence, and comprehensive product offerings—stand out as Going Securities’ most significant strengths.